Re: Generalising inlined images

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Oct 93-present
• Next message: Rob McCool: "Re: Generalising inlined images"
• Previous message: Rob McCool: "Re: advice on httpd sought"
• In-reply-to: Kevin Altis: "Re: Generalising inlined images"
• References: Kevin Altis: "Re: Generalising inlined images"
• Reply: Rob McCool: "Re: Generalising inlined images"

X-Delivered: at request of secret on dxcern.cern.ch
Message-id: <kggt5eEB0KGWM2LKQm@holmes.parc.xerox.com>
Date: 	Wed, 6 Oct 1993 20:47:54 PDT
Sender: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.xerox.com>
From: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.xerox.com>
To: Dave_Raggett <dsr@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Nathan.Torkington@vuw.ac.nz,
        kevin@scic.intel.com (Kevin Altis)
Subject: Re: Generalising inlined images
Cc: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
In-reply-to: <9310061845.AA16939@rs042.scic.intel.com>
References: <9310061845.AA16939@rs042.scic.intel.com>

Isn't this what Tim was calling EMBED?

<EMBED HREF="..."> or <EMBED SRC="...">, where the HREF form was used
with URL's, and the SRC form was used with local files (and was
therefore much less portable).  Good idea to have EMBED, but Tony is
right in saying that the type should go in that document, not in the
EMBED statement, although I could see a type attribute if the SRC form
were to be used.

Bill