Re: Semicolon's for all

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Oct 93-present
• Next message: Tony Sanders: "Re: Semicolon's for all "
• Previous message: Charles Henrich: "Re: Semicolon's for all"
• In-reply-to: Charles Henrich: "Re: Semicolon's for all"
• References: Robert S. Thau: "Re: Semicolon's for all"
• Reply: Charles Henrich: "Re: Semicolon's for all"

Date: Fri, 31 Dec 93 18:44:35 -0600
From: marca@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Marc Andreessen)
Message-id: <9401010044.AA19468@wintermute.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Cc: rst@ai.mit.edu (Robert S. Thau), www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Subject: Re: Semicolon's for all
In-reply-to: <9312312215.AA05704@crh.cl.msu.edu>
References: <9312311855.AA04894@volterra>
	<9312312215.AA05704@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Content-Length: 455

Charles Henrich writes:
> What happens in a year when folks want to add something and CGI is
> well entrenched?

Then CGI/1.1 is spec'd and stabilized.  

One of the points behind CGI/1.0 was to reach a point of stability wrt
shifting and nontransportable script interfaces; that this stability
has been reached at the "1.0" level is a good thing.

Cheers,
Marc

--
Marc Andreessen
Enterprise Integration Technologies
Palo Alto, California
marca@eit.com