Compton's patent is dead.
Lillian.Elam@eng.sun.com (Lile Elam)
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 00:26:06 --100
Message-id: <9403242332.AA01542@bayside.Eng.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: Lillian.Elam@eng.sun.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Lillian.Elam@eng.sun.com (Lile Elam)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Compton's patent is dead.
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 3090
Content-Length: 3090
Here's some good news. :) Compton's patent has been rejected upon
re-examination and is now dead.. This will really make a difference
for things such as Mosaic and is a great win for all.
-lile
------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934) -------
Message-Id: <199403241941.AA04453@world.std.com>
From: srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian)
To: patents@world.std.com
Subject: Compton's patent rejected during reexamination
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 1994 14:41:58 -0500
Ding-dong, the wicked patent is dead. Though I bet Compton's made more
money on the PR generate than any royalties that could have been collected.
Surprisingly, there are more serious software patent infringement cases with
worse claims than the Compton patent, though not getting as much attention.
Greg Aharonian
Internet Patent News Service
==============================================================
|||||||||| |||||||||| Information Express
|| || a voorhees report
|| ||
|| ||||||| 718-369-0906 voice
|| || 636-8931 MCI Mail
|| ||
|||||||||| |||||||||| 411 First St., Brooklyn, NY 11215
==============================================================
(c) 1994 Mark Voorhees
PATENT OFFICE REJECTS COMPTON'S NEWMEDIA PATENT
Controversial CD-ROM filing falls during re-exam
March 24, 1994--The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected the
controversial Compton's NewMedia patent during a re-examination.
The patent covers basic techniques for searching and
retrieving information from CD-ROM data bases. It has generated
wide criticism in the computer and technology fields as a symbol
of the problems with software patents. Some critics say the
techniques were not new at the time of the patent filing. A
minority of critics say patents should not cover software.
Most or all of the 41 claims were rejected on the basis that
they were not novel or were obvious. The rejection was delivered
to Encyclopaedia Britannica, one of the patent owners, last
Wednesday.
Encyclopaedia Britannica and Tribune Co., the other patent
owner, will have at least once chance to persuade the office that
its rejection is wrong. Afterward, the owners can appeal either
to federal court or to an appellate tribunal within the patent
office.
Examiner Archie Williams cited a popular computer book, The
HyperCard Handbook, and several patents as evidence that
Compton's NewMedia was not the first inventor of the CD-ROM
techniques.
Patent Commissioner Bruce Lehman took the rare step of
ordering the re-exam after industry protest over how
the patent would upset the advance of multimedia and interactive
technologies.
| Mark Voorhees | voorhees reports
| | 411 first street
| 636-8931 MCI Mail | brooklyn, ny 11215-2507
| | 1-718-369-0906 (voice)
| markvoor@phantom.com | 1-718-369-3250 (fax)
------- end -------