Re: <fontsize>

atotic@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Alexsander Totic)

Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
Next message: Joe Germuska: "Re: <fontsize>"
Previous message: David Koblas: "Re: <fontsize>"
In-reply-to: David Koblas: "Re: <fontsize>"

From: atotic@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Alexsander Totic)
Message-id: <9401101710.AA22999@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: <fontsize>
To: koblas@netcom.com (David Koblas)
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 1994 11:10:49 -0600 (CST)
Cc: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
In-reply-to: <199401101647.IAA27401@mail.netcom.com> from "David Koblas" at Jan 10, 94 08:47:34 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 506

> > Perhaps we should define a <fontsize [1-6]> tag, instead of the <h> tags.
> 
> It would be nice, since just today I wanted to do:
>         <UL>
>         <LI><h1><A HREF=...>Some Text</A></h1>
>         <LI> ...
> The results were not what I was expecting, it does appear funny at times
> that there is no way to vary the point size.  If there was then <H?> tags
> would just become <P><em size=?>...<em size=?><P>.
> 
How about <em h1>? This is really what the document writers are doing now.

Aleks