Re: Whitespace

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: Kevin 'Kev' Hughes: "Re: minimal HTML"
• Previous message: Alexsander Totic: "Re: Whitespace"
• In-reply-to: Alexsander Totic: "Re: Whitespace"
• Reply: Scott W Brim: "Re: Whitespace"

From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-id: <9401110510.AA12668@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: Whitespace
To: atotic@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Alexsander Totic)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 1994 00:10:57 -0500 (EST)
Cc: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
In-reply-to: <9401110507.AA05335@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu> from "Alexsander Totic" at Jan 10, 94 11:07:25 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 531       

> > Why not just <f1> ?
>
> Because <f1> is similar to <b>, <i>, whose use should be discouraged. <em>
> tag is the one that should be used for rendering hints.

Ah Thats where I disagree.  Overloading the <em> tag excessivly is a bad idea,
which has at some point been agreed to on the list, when the initial HTML+ spec
used <em bold> instead of <b>.   Explicit tags are not a bad thing IMHO.

-Crh

    Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu

                     http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/