Re: Inlined image format

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: George Phillips: "Re: Inlined image format"
• Previous message: Rob McCool: "Re: CGI and REMOTE_USER"
• In-reply-to: Lou Montulli: "Re: Inlined image format"

Message-id: <9401260054.AA10879@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu>
From: robm@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Rob McCool)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 1994 18:54:55 -0600
In-Reply-To: montulli@stat1.cc.ukans.edu (Lou Montulli)
       "Re: Inlined image format" (Jan 25,  6:17pm)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: montulli@stat1.cc.ukans.edu (Lou Montulli),
        sanders@BSDI.COM (Tony Sanders)
Subject: Re: Inlined image format
Cc: phillips@cs.ubc.ca, www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Content-Length: 613

/*
 * Re: Inlined image format  by Lou Montulli
 *    written on Jan 25,  6:17pm.
 *
 * How about adding a new header or a new form of the existing
 * header to specify what kinds of image types can be "inlined"
 * The server may want to differentiate between a get that is
 * coming for an image that will be inlined and one that will
 * be spawned in an external viewer.
 */

I would think that the server shouldn't care... otherwise, how would it know
what was an inlined image and what wasn't? It seems to me that Mosaic should
just send different Accept: headers when it's resolving inlined images...

--Rob