Re: Comments on HTML+ Request For Comments
Jonathan Abbey <broccol@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 1994 23:19:40 -0600
From: Jonathan Abbey <broccol@arlut.utexas.edu>
Message-id: <199402010519.XAA17264@csdsun1.arlut.utexas.edu>
To: forman@cs.washington.edu
Cc: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Subject: Re: Comments on HTML+ Request For Comments
Content-Length: 956
George Forman wrote:
| You believe "KEYWORDS is inadequate" and we should have something else. I
| agree, but KEYWORDS should also be supported. There's a lot of existing
| literature that has keywords, and it's better to be able to semantically tag
| their keywords than to ignore them.
|
| I don't know about Interpedia. If no one posts something, I encourage
| you to post what you know.
Re: KEYWORDS, Agreed. Ideally, both would be present, with KEYWORDS being
able to be used as a further refinement once you exhaust the possibility of a
hierarchical categorization scheme.
I'll see if I can dig up some information on Interpedia for the list.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Abbey broccol@arlut.utexas.edu
Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------