Re: A thought on implementation...
Marc Salomon <marc@library.ucsf.edu>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 22:33:11 --100
Message-id: <199402172127.AA25256@library.ucsf.edu >
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: marc@library.ucsf.edu
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Marc Salomon <marc@library.ucsf.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: A thought on implementation...
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 510
Pei Y. Wei wrote:
|For the long run, if we can agree on some sort of architectural form,
|and have a nice SGML parser to attach to the browser, then we're closer
|to multiple DTD capable browsers.
I was thinking that instead of building a full SGML parser onto each browser
that the browser could open a connection to a TCP/IP-based SGML parser
(forgiving a la mosaic) server that would take as input a document instance
and return an ESIS that the browser could use for rendering.
-marc
marc@ckm.ucsf.edu