complaint about CGI

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: Rob McCool: "Re: CGI/1.1 draft"
• Previous message: Peter Deutsch: "Re: The future of meta-indices/libraries?"
• Maybe in reply to: Rob McCool: "Re: complaint about CGI"

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 07:27:58 --100
Message-id: <9403160625.AA22600@moulon.moulon.inra.fr>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: decoux@moulon.inra.fr
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: decoux@moulon.inra.fr (ts)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: complaint about CGI
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 538

> Rob suggested:
> >Status: xxx mmm
> >
> >where xxx is the 3 digit HTTP status code, and mmm is the message, such as
> >Forbidden.
> 
> I don't have a problem with this being added, but it isn't strictly
> necessary as you can output any code you want if you write an
> nph- script.
> 
> 

 I write nph-script only to send, sometimes, code different from 200 and
301.

 It's really easy to send only a header line "Status: xxx mmm", rather than
send all header lines ("MIME-Version", "Content-type", "Content-length", ...)


Guy Decoux