Re: Interest in HTML Conformance?
Liam Relihan <relihanl@ul.ie>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 1994 21:53:49 --100
Message-id: <Pine.3.05.9404112026.E255-b100000@itdsrv1.ul.ie>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: relihanl@ul.ie
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Liam Relihan <relihanl@ul.ie>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Interest in HTML Conformance?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mime-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Length: 1031
On Mon, 11 Apr 1994, Daniel W. Connolly wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> Are most folks (including the NCSA Mosaic licensees) content to define
> HTML as "whatever the latest release of Mosaic supports", or are we
No !!!
> interested in published specifications? And do we have resources to
> contribute toward that end?
Yes !!
We need published specs...the current situation is plain looney...we
cannot expect the web to be treated seriously by developers if the current
state of the main data format is not defined. I think that we can certainly
get an RFC for HTML together....I am willing to help out.
Using Mosaic as the "standard setter" is quite alright for the moment, but we
shall eventually need some stability.
Liam
--
Liam Relihan, | |\ Voice: +353-61-333644 ext.5015
CSIS, Schumann Building, - | |_/ - Fax:+353-61-330876
University Of Limerick, |__ | \ E-mail: relihanl@ul.ie
Ireland. http://itdsrv1.ul.ie/PERSONNEL/lrelihan.html