Re: Toward Closure on HTML

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
• Next message: Marc Andreessen: "to RFC or not (was: Re: Toward Closure on HTML )"
• Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Toward Closure on HTML "
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Toward Closure on HTML "
• Reply: Marc Andreessen: "Re: Toward Closure on HTML "

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 1994 18:40:58 --100
Message-id: <199404051638.AA08286@RA.DEPT.CS.YALE.EDU>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: letovsky-stan@CS.YALE.EDU
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Stan Letovsky <letovsky-stan@CS.YALE.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Toward Closure on HTML 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 652

Subject: Re: Toward Closure on HTML 
From:    "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
Date:    Tue, 05 Apr 94 10:29:44 CDT
To:      letovsky-stan
cc:      Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
---------
>> But the
>>bigger issue is that you are ignoring user preferences in favor
>>of anal-retentive coder preferences: no one but a parser-writer
>>would view <p> ... </p> as an elegant way to say "this is a
>>paragraph.
>
>Is it necessary to vent like this to the whole list? I'd prefer you
>sent your personal remarks in private email.

Was not intended as a personal remark. Should have added :-).
Sorry to have given offense.

-Stan