Re: Browser/Server Evaluation Project

Ton Verschuren <Ton.Verschuren@surfnet.nl>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Tue, 17 May 1994 12:54:35 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <"survis.sur.833:17.04.94.10.49.47"@surfnet.nl>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: Ton.Verschuren@surfnet.nl
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Ton Verschuren <Ton.Verschuren@surfnet.nl>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Browser/Server Evaluation Project
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
==> From: Brandon Plewe

> Instead, I think it would be valuable for one of us (I could be involved, but
> don't have the time to spearhead it) to do a comprehensive comparison of the
> WWW Browsers out there (PD and Commercial).  This could be a central site for
> people looking for one, or wondering what the most current version is and
> where to get it.
> 
> Would anyone like to work with me on this?

There's been already some effort going on in this area, viz. on the NIR
list (nir@mailbase.ac.uk) and the UNITE list (unite@mailbase.ac.uk;
subscribe through mailbase@mailbase.ac.uk). In particular, there are some
evaluations of WWW browsers available in the UNITE archive
<URL:gopher://nisp.ncl.ac.uk/11/lists-u-z/unite/files/>. You may even
search the unite archive at
<URL:gopher://mailbase.ac.uk/77/lists/unite/.waisindex/files>.

I guess you'll find a willing audience for more evaluations there.

Ton Verschuren - Network Development - SURFnet bv