Re: Queries on HTMLPLUS
"Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Tue, 17 May 1994 16:08:51 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <9405171403.AA04598@ulua.hal.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: connolly@hal.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Queries on HTMLPLUS
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
In message <9405171053.AA01079@fcpl.fcpl.ernet.in>, CVR Murthy writes:
>I have some queries on HTML+ :
>first of all, is there any latest Internet RFC standard for HTML+ ?
> (the latest I have is the Internet Draft Standard Oct'93)
Nothing has been "published" on this front for some time...
But there are documents online:
http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/MarkUp/HTMLPlus/htmlplus_1.html
(see also:
http://www.hal.com/%7Econnolly/drafts/htmlplus-comments.html )
And the rumors of the demise of HTML have been greatly exaggerated.
Expect to see a spec with wide support soon. Sorry I can't be more
specific, but you can consult my design notebook:
http://www.hal.com/%7Econnolly/drafts/html-design.html
which includes my working DTD and a test suite for HTML.
>secondly, is there any formal syntax (like BNF) defined for HTML+
> Markup language?
Nope. There's a DTD for HTML+, but there are also comments in the
spec that say that the DTD is not and _exact_ description of HTML+.
HTML will continue to be defined in strict compliance with SGML.
(How it's implemented is, of course, a different story... :-)
>thirdly, what is DTD and how can one use it to build parsers?
Welcome to SGML! Seriously... get the sgmls package and some
of the other goodies from:
ftp://ifi.uio.no/pub/SGML/
> and
>lastly, what is Pageless mode in HTMLPLUS?
Can't help you there... Dave?
Dan