Re: Cache woes.

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
• Next message: Jonny Goldman: "SIGWEB #7 Announcement: SIGWEB and WWW94"
• Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Cache woes. "
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Cache woes. "

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 20 May 1994 17:27:07 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <9405201524.AA11832@ulua.hal.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: connolly@hal.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Cache woes. 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0

In message <9405201511.AA11806@ulua.hal.com>, "Daniel W. Connolly" writes:
>
>By the way... these issues are the province of the URI working group,
>whose discussion forum is the uri mailing list. Contact uri-request@bunyip.com
>.

Bad choice of words... Let me rephrase that... It's not like
WWW is bound by what the URI WG says.

They do talk about this stuff a lot though.

Dan