Re: Security (was Re: Style Sheets for HTML)

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
• Next message: Rainer Klute: "Re: Security (was Re: Style Sheets for HTML) "
• Previous message: HALLAM-BAKER Phillip: "Re: Security (was Re: Style Sheets for HTML)"
• Maybe in reply to: HALLAM-BAKER Phillip: "Re: Security (was Re: Style Sheets for HTML)"
• Reply: Fisher Mark: "Re: Security (was Re: Style Sheets for HTML)"

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Tue, 31 May 1994 23:35:29 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <9405312131.AA13887@dxal18.cern.ch>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: hallam@dxal18.cern.ch
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: hallam@dxal18.cern.ch (HALLAM-BAKER Phillip)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Security (was Re: Style Sheets for HTML)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas

In article <713B@cernvm.cern.ch> you write:

|>I think the "chunking" idea is still the way to go.  Any useful browser
|>under the current window systems will let the user copy the information
|>somehow (even if has to be screen-shot by screen-shot).  Just a basic
|>fact-of-life/feature/opportunity/bug in computing.

Nope, disabling the copy screen operation will be a requirement to get 
compliance certification for the security extensions. Without that nobody
will install the browser at a secure site for access to secure data.

--
Phillip M. Hallam-Baker

Not Speaking for anyone else.