Re: Are all X browsers bad for (CERN) networks?

roeber@vscrna.cern.ch (Frederick G.M. Roeber)

Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
Next message: Ton Verschuren: "Re: List"
Previous message: Liam Relihan: "Re: meta information"

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 1994 13:05:55 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Message-id: <9406031103.AA27229@dxmint.cern.ch>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: roeber@vscrna.cern.ch
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: roeber@vscrna.cern.ch (Frederick G.M. Roeber)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Are all X browsers bad for (CERN) networks?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas

>Subject:Are all X browsers bad for (CERN) networks?
>
>This title comes from running the best known WWW X browser on an
>X-terminal having a "network activity" light.

I disagree -- I'd say all *X terminals* are bad for networks.
[ Followed closely by diskless workstations ].
--  
<a href="http://info.cern.ch/roeber/fgmr.html">Frederick.</a>
"Ontology recapitulates philology."  -- Harry Quackenboss