Re: Progress reporting in future HTTP

Thomas Walsh (tomw@netcom.com)
Wed, 10 Aug 1994 10:33:52 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul : "HTTP/1.0 based daemon. Should 0.9 be supported"
Previous message: Mark Cox: "Re: Progress reporting in future HTTP"
Maybe in reply to: Bob Kanefsky: "Progress reporting in future HTTP"
Next in thread: Rick Troth: "Re: Progress reporting in future HTTP"

I second this motion.
It would be extremely useful in the situation when a request (potentially one
part of a compound set of requests or actions ) was farmed out to multiple
servers. the status or results may have time limits or data size limits
before the rest of the request(S) proceed.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Fluent Networks
"The Information Superhighway At Your FingerTips"
#include <std.disclaim.h>
tomw@netcom.com
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Next message: Paul : "HTTP/1.0 based daemon. Should 0.9 be supported"
Previous message: Mark Cox: "Re: Progress reporting in future HTTP"
Maybe in reply to: Bob Kanefsky: "Progress reporting in future HTTP"
Next in thread: Rick Troth: "Re: Progress reporting in future HTTP"