Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> required for HTML 2.0? (Peter Flynn)
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 94 04:41:05 EDT
Message-id: <>
Precedence: bulk
From: (Peter Flynn)
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> required for HTML 2.0?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Implementation Group (Private)
> The current working draft of the spec says that an HTML data
> stream is supposed to be a complete SGML document, i.e. it's
> supposed to include the
> 	<!DOCTYPE HTML ...>
> stuff.

Picky but correct.

> i.e. which of the following are legal, and which are
> just "widely tolerated"?

Neither. Both.