Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> required for HTML email@example.com (Peter Flynn)
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 94 04:41:05 EDT
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Peter Flynn)
To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> required for HTML 2.0?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: HTML Implementation Group (Private)
> The current working draft of the spec says that an HTML data
> stream is supposed to be a complete SGML document, i.e. it's
> supposed to include the
> <!DOCTYPE HTML ...>
Picky but correct.
> i.e. which of the following are legal, and which are
> just "widely tolerated"?