> SGML in MIME
> is much more sophisticated, and offers much better support
> for the standard SGML mechanisms.
I maintain that my model is internally consistent and sufficiently
expressive for both cases, and not observably different from the
way HTML 2.0 has worked for some time.
> Perhaps overspecification is the price to pay for generality. The price
> you extract is incompatibility.
"Sticks and stones." An unsubstantiated conjecture such as this isn't
worth the electrons wasted to carry it.
> I will reply at length in the next day or so.
We shall see...
Dan