html-wg-95q2 by date

Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

Starting: Mon 03 Apr 1995 - 06:51:24 MDT
Ending: Fri 30 Jun 1995 - 19:04:51 MDT
Messages: 1431

Suggestion for HTML Text Format Elements hshpcg
What happend to <LINK NAME="..." ... >? Murray Maloney
Re: META Terry Allen
Re: META Glenn Adams
Re: META Terry Allen
Re: META Glenn Adams
HTML 2.0 June 15 draft: Bibliography links to sources? 361 Lauritsen, x8379
Re: META Terry Allen
Re: META Terry Allen
Re: META Peter Flynn
Re: INCLUDE (was: Re: META) Glenn Adams
INCLUDE (was: Re: META) Bert Bos
Re: META David Morris
Re: META Ronald E. Daniel
Re: META Glenn Adams
Re: META Eric Miller
Re: META weibel@oclc.org
Re: META Bert Bos
Re: META Marc Salomon
Re: META Murray Maloney
Re: META Glenn Adams
Re: META weibel@oclc.org
Re: META Albert Lunde
Re: META Glenn Adams
unsanctioned drift weibel@oclc.org
Re: META Terry Allen
FYI: HTML 2.0 Eric W. Sink
Re: META Glenn Adams
Re: META weibel@oclc.org
Re: META Albert Lunde
Re: META Albert Lunde
Re: META Tom Magliery
Re: META Glenn Adams
Re: META Albert Lunde
Re: META Glenn Adams
Re: META Terry Allen
Re: META Terry Allen
Re: META Glenn Adams
Re: META Tom Magliery
Re: META Terry Allen
Re: META Ronald E. Daniel
Re: META Ronald E. Daniel
Re: META Glenn Adams
META Eric Miller
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) David Morris
Re: netscapism quote Gavin Nicol
Re: netscapism quote weibel@oclc.org
Re: netscapism quote Erik Naggum
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Bert Bos
Re:netscapism quote Daniel Glazman
Re: netscapism quote Brian Behlendorf
Re: netscapism quote Daniel W. Connolly
Use of ALIGN attribute with ADDRESS (html 3.0) 361 Lauritsen, x8379
netscapism quote Erik Naggum
tables, map pages connolly@w3.org
tables, map pages rai@mac7100.tau.it
tables, map pages donald@mac7100.tau.it
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Walter Ian Kaye
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Peter Flynn
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Glenn Adams
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Dave Kristol
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) lilley
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Brian Behlendorf
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Bert Bos
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) lilley
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Dave Hollander
Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Glenn Adams
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Murray Maloney
LI syntax, Modest Proposal Terry Allen
Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Murray Maloney
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Maurizio Codogno
Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Paul Grosso
Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Daniel W. Connolly
Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Bert Bos
Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Ian Graham
Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Joe English
Re: InsignificantTypo man's crazy idea Walter Ian Kaye
Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
InsignificantTypo man's crazy idea Philip Merrill
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-04.txt Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Murray Maloney
Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Daniel W. Connolly
Re: METHODS and TITLE lee@sq.com
Re: METHODS and TITLE Murray Maloney
Re: METHODS and TITLE David Morris
Re: METHODS and TITLE Murray Maloney
Re: METHODS and TITLE Larry Masinter
Re: METHODS and TITLE David Morris
Re: METHODS and TITLE Joe English
Re: METHODS and TITLE Daniel Wood - FES OPS ~
Re: METHODS and TITLE Murray Maloney
Re: METHODS and TITLE Larry Masinter
Re: METHODS and TITLE Albert Lunde
METHODS and TITLE Tom Magliery
Re: A/LINK attributes Tim Pierce
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Murray Maloney
Re: A/LINK attributes stiddu@di.unito.it
A/LINK attributes (was Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long)) Walter Ian Kaye
Re: content model of HEAD Terry Allen
Re: html.dtd broken? Joe English
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Peter Flynn
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Peter Flynn
Re: content model of HEAD lee@sq.com
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Peter Flynn
Re: Whence the HTML DTD [was] Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Albert Lunde
Re: Whence the HTML DTD [was] Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? David Morris
Re: June 15 draft -- DL Murray Maloney
Re: June 15 draft -- DL Albert Lunde
Re: html.dtd broken? Daniel W. Connolly
Re: content model of HEAD Joe English
Re: June 15 draft -- DL David Morris
Re: Whence the HTML DTD [was] Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? lee@sq.com
Re: Broken links on HTML Math page at www.htl.hp.co.ukI got a failure report when trying to email ht weibel@oclc.org
Broken links on HTML Math page at www.htl.hp.co.uk Edward Welbourne
June 15 draft by ftp Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Stockholm registration Eric W. Sink
Re: June 15 draft -- DL Murray Maloney
Re: June 15 draft -- DL Joe English
June 15 draft: INPUT, ISO-8859, SGML references Daniel W. Connolly
Whence the HTML DTD [was] Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? David Morris
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? David Morris
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? David Morris
Re: Latin-1 references Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Daniel W. Connolly
Fragment IDs case sensitive? [was: Comments on June 8 draft (long) ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: <TEXTAREA> content Joe English
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? kennykb@dssv01.crd.ge.com
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Joe English
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: <TEXTAREA> content Ka-Ping Yee
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Mike Meyer
Re: Latin-1 references Glenn Adams
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Glenn Adams
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Glenn Adams
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Peter Flynn
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Peter Flynn
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Thomas BjurbSigmack
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Christophe ESPERT
Re: Re:More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Christophe ESPERT
Latin-1 references Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Walter Ian Kaye
June 8 draft by ftp Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: content model of HEAD Joe English
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Mike Meyer
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Peter Flynn
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Tim Pierce
Re: Hyperlink Terminology Re: Comments on June 8 draft Ralph Ferris
Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Joe English
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Peter Flynn
Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Mike Meyer
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Joe English
Re: Hyperlink Terminology Re: Comments on June 8 draft Terry Allen
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Peter Flynn
content model of HEAD lee@sq.com
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? David Morris
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Tom Magliery
Hyperlink Terminology Re: Comments on June 8 draft Ralph Ferris
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Terry Allen
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Terry Allen
[jkrey@isi.edu: RFC1808 on Relative Uniform Resource Locators] Larry Masinter
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Murray Maloney
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) David Morris
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? David Morris
Hyperlink Terminology Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Ian Graham
Comments on June 8 draft (long) Joe English
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Tim Pierce
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Amanda Walker
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Joe English
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Daniel W. Connolly
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Terry Allen
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Gavin Nicol
Re:More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Christophe ESPERT
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Amanda Walker
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Glenn Adams
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Dave Kristol
Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Eric W. Sink
More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Daniel W. Connolly
Re: June 8 draft: minor nits. the last one? Francois Yergeau
Re: Presentation methods/media types Larry Masinter
Re: June 8 draft: minor nits. the last one? David - Morris
Re: June 8 draft: minor nits. the last one? David - Morris
Null partial URLs with fragment IDs: spec vs behavior! Pierre Desjardins
Re: RFC's In HTML Format Walt Houser
Re: Presentation methods/media types kennykb@dssv01.crd.ge.com
Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST Joe English
Re: Java Applet element proposal Craig Hubley
June 8 draft: minor nits. the last one? Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Numeric char references Martin J Duerst
Re: Case Sensitivity Joe English
Re: Presentation methods/media types (was: Java Applet element proposal) Larry Masinter
Re: Numeric char references Daniel W. Connolly
Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST Daniel W. Connolly
Re: How do you include a <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE"> to work? kennykb@dssv01.crd.ge.com
Re: Numeric char references Daniel W. Connolly
Re: How do you include a <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE"> to work? Daniel W. Connolly
Case Sensitivity Daniel W. Connolly
Presentation methods/media types (was: Java Applet element proposal) Ka-Ping Yee
Re: Java Applet element proposal Peter Flynn
Re: Java Applet element proposal Dianne Hackborn
Re: Numeric char references Peter Flynn
Re: http server which returns "charset:" correctly Bob Jung
Re: http server which returns "charset:" correctly Francois Yergeau
Re: Java Applet element proposal Tim Pierce
Re: http server which returns "charset:" correctly Daniel W. Connolly
http server which returns "charset:" correctly Martin J Duerst
A Multimedia-didactical improvement/suggestion. Tesi Sirovich - 160295
Re: Java Applet element proposal Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Java Applet element proposal kennykb@dssv01.crd.ge.com
Re: Java Applet element proposal Terry Allen
Re: Java Applet element proposal Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Java Applet element proposal Walter Ian Kaye
Re: COMPOSITE (was Re: APPLET = FIG) Paul Burchard
Re: LAST UPDATED and FRESH UNTIL dates Peter Flynn
Re: LAST UPDATED and FRESH UNTIL dates Alexei Kosut
LAST UPDATED and FRESH UNTIL dates roedy@BIX.com
Re: Numeric char references Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Numeric char references Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Draft document in PostScript Hannah Kaufman
Re: Numeric char references Daniel W. Connolly
Numeric char references Jonsm@aol.com
Re: COMPOSITE (was Re: APPLET = FIG) Brian Behlendorf
conformance with HTML-2, LINT? roedy@BIX.com
COMPOSITE (was Re: APPLET = FIG) Paul Burchard
Re: Java Applet element proposal Dianne Hackborn
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Larry Masinter
TAGLVL Glenn Adams
Re: How do you include a <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE"> to work? kennykb@dssv01.crd.ge.com
RE: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST Fisher Mark
Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Ian Graham
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Eric W. Sink
Re: Java Applet element proposal lilley
Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) James Clark
HTML 2.0 DTD Peter Flynn
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Larry Masinter
7.2.1 footnote 1 Glenn Adams
Re: APPLET = FIG (was Re: Java Applet element proposal) Paul Burchard
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Mike Meyer
HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: <TEXTAREA> content Ka-Ping Yee
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Gavin Nicol
Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Joe English
Q: Where to find DTDs referenced in HTML3 draft Robert Tolksdorf
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Glenn Adams
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Terry Allen
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Martin J Duerst
Re: APPLET = FIG (was Re: Java Applet element proposal) Walter Ian Kaye
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Gavin Nicol
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Terry Allen
Re: APPLET = FIG (was Re: Java Applet element proposal) Terry Allen
Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Murray Maloney
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs David - Morris
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Gavin Nicol
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Albert Lunde
<XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Joe English
APPLET = FIG (was Re: Java Applet element proposal) Paul Burchard
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL David - Morris
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Peter Flynn
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Arthur van Hoff
Re: May 31 Draft David - Morris
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Security words David - Morris
Re: Java Applet element proposal Terry Allen
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Joe English
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Minor typos Jim Hurley
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Terry Allen
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Terry Allen
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs (fwd)Precedence: bulk Martin J Duerst
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Terry Allen
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 Tidbits Bruce Kahn/Iris
Dexterm Model [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements (fwd) ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements (fwd) Murray Maloney
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Murray Maloney
Re: HTML 2.0 Tidbits lilley
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements lilley
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Comment Declarations Joe English
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Larry Masinter
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: May 31 Draft Daniel W. Connolly
HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: DOCTYPEs Andrew McRae
Re: HTML 2.0 Tidbits Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Security words Paul Burchard
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Security words Daniel W. Connolly
Re [LAST CALL]: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Paul Burchard
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: *emph() and acknowledgements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Comment Declarations Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Java Applet element proposal Paul Burchard
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL David - Morris
Re: Java Applet element proposal Peter Flynn
May 31 Draft Peter Flynn
Java Applet element proposal Terry Allen
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-03.txt Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements lilley
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections James Clark
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Francois Yergeau
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Terry Allen
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Security words David - Morris
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Paul Burchard
acknowledgements weibel@oclc.org
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs David - Morris
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: *emph() and acknowledgements David - Morris
Re: new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Peter Flynn
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Eric W. Sink
Re: new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Peter Flynn
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Daniel W. Connolly
new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Joe English
Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Eric W. Sink
Re: Comment Declarations Joe English
HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: RFC's In HTML Format postel@ISI.EDU
Re: Comment Declarations yuri@sq.com
Re: Comment Declarations Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Comment Declarations yuri@sq.com
Re: Comment Declarations Joe English
(no subject) John newton
HTML style sheets mailing list H&kon W Lie
Re: HTML v2.0 focus and closure Francois Yergeau
Re: Comment Declarations Paul Grosso
Re: Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995 Francois Yergeau
Usability of HTML 2.0/3.0 specs -- element names in TOC 361 Lauritsen, x8379
HTML v2.0 focus and closure Keith Ball
Re: Comment Declarations Dieter Baron
Looking for help.....HTML Questions\Feedback H&kon W Lie
Re: RFC's In HTML Format Walt Houser
Re: Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995 Gavin Nicol
Re: WISE NASA WWW Project Management... (my mistake) John F. Stitzinger
Re: Interim meeting? Larry Masinter
Re: Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646? Eric W. Sink
Re: RFC's In HTML Format houser@cpcug.org
Re: RFC's In HTML Format houser@cpcug.org
Re: Comment Declarations Peter Flynn
Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995 Eric W. Sink
Wet blankets Eric W. Sink
Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646? Albert Lunde
Re: Re REL/REV links Craig Hubley
Interim meeting? Eric W. Sink
Re: PIs and deployment Craig Hubley
Re: Re REL/REV links Craig Hubley
Looking for help.....HTML Questions\Feedback Wallace, Jonathan M.
Re: Comment Declarations Glenn Adams
Re: HTML Link types - user hint? or hardwired internal browser call ? Terry Allen
Re: Comment Declarations Paul Grosso
Re: Comment Declarations Glenn Adams
HTML Link types - user hint? or hardwired internal browser call ? Craig Hubley
Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Craig Hubley
Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Terry Allen
Re: HTML Links and Paths Craig Hubley
Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Craig Hubley
Re: HTML Links and Paths Terry Allen
HTML Links and Paths Murray Maloney
Re: Re REL/REV links Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set James Clark
Re: backward compatibility for links Roy T. Fielding
Re: Re REL/REV links Murray Maloney
Re: Re REL/REV links David - Morris
Re: Re REL/REV links Terry Allen
Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Ian Graham
Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Albert Lunde
PIs and deployment Terry Allen
Re: Re REL/REV links Murray Maloney
Re: backward compatibility for links + more random thoughts David - Morris
Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Terry Allen
backward compatibility for links Larry Masinter
Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Craig Hubley
(no subject) Murray Altheim
Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Ian Graham
Re: HTML Link Type Model Craig Hubley
Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Craig Hubley
Re: HTML Link Type Model Craig Hubley
Re: HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues Craig Hubley
Re: HTML Link Type Model Craig Hubley
Re REL/REV links Terry Allen
Re: Definitions of semantic format elements Larry Masinter
Re: HTML Link Type Model Roy T. Fielding
Re: HTML Link Type Model Roy T. Fielding
Re: Hypertext links in HTML Murray Maloney
Mail failure MS Mail Connector
Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal David - Morris
Re: My x-dead x-body [was] Re: HTML Link Type Model Craig Hubley
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections David - Morris
Character markup in HTML3 vs. HTML[012] Mike Meyer
Re: HTML Link Type Model - where to standardize ? Craig Hubley
Re: HTML Link Type Model Craig Hubley
Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) David - Morris
Re: Hypertext links in HTML Bert Bos
Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Ian Graham
My x-dead x-body [was] Re: HTML Link Type Model David - Morris
Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Larry Masinter
Re: HTML Link Type Model Murray Maloney
Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Murray Maloney
Re: HTML Link Type Model Gavin Nicol
Re: HTML Link Type Model Murray Maloney
Re: HTML Link Type Model Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML tables - trying to reach consensus Bert Bos
Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Bert Bos
Re: HTML Link Type Model Roy T. Fielding
Re: HTML Link Type Model Joe English
Re: HTML Link Type Model Albert Lunde
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Roy T. Fielding
Re: Links and Interactivity Craig Hubley
HTML Link Type Model Roy T. Fielding
Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al David - Morris
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Roy T. Fielding
Re: HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues Murray Maloney
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Terry Allen
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Joe English
Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Murray Maloney
Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Paul Burchard
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Murray Maloney
Further on new "spec-02" Terry Allen
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Terry Allen
Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Larry Masinter
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Joe English
Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Michael J Hannah
Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al Michael J Hannah
Re: Links and Interactivity Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Murray Maloney
Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Albert Lunde
HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues Craig Hubley
Re: HTML 3.0 Brian Behlendorf
HTML link types - treatment of nonstandard / documentary REL values Craig Hubley
HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Craig Hubley
Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al Craig Hubley
Re: WG Citation Attribution - a Plea! Peter Flynn
Using the HTML format for e-mail messages and Usenet News articles Jacob Palme
Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al Peter Flynn
Links and Interactivity Paul Burchard
Re: HTML 3.0 Brian Exelbierd
Re: Re(2): HTML Documents (SGML text) Craig Hubley
Re: HR and RE Joe English
WG Citation Attribution - a Plea! David - Morris
HR and RE Jonsm@aol.com
on Why= with keyword REV= et al David - Morris
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? David - Morris
Re: Comment Declarations Daniel W. Connolly
[ANNOUNCE] Pre-Release of WISE: A WWW-Based Software Metrics Tool Jack R. Callahan
Re: HTML Documents Daniel W. Connolly
Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Murray Maloney
Re: Definitions of semantic format elements David - Morris
Definitions of semantic format elements Larry Masinter
Re: RFC's In HTML Format David - Morris
Re: RFC's In HTML Format Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
Re(2): HTML Documents (SGML text) James D Mason
Re: HTML Documents (SGML text) lilley
Re: HTML Documents (SGML text) James D Mason
HTML Documents Vuong Nguyen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Albert Lunde
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Martin J Duerst
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Craig Hubley
REL/REV Link ideas Alex Hopmann
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Albert Lunde
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Mike Meyer
Character sets: the last straw. Amanda Walker
Re: Link style sheets Craig Hubley
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Craig Hubley
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Craig Hubley
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Ned Freed
Re: RFC's In HTML Format Albert Lunde
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Mike Meyer
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Albert Lunde
[Q] Links inside maths in HTML3 jarle.brinchmann@astro.uio.no
Re: RFC's In HTML Format Walter Houser
Re: Link style sheets Craig Hubley
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Craig Hubley
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Ned Freed
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Ned Freed
Re: RFC's In HTML Format Scott W Brim
RFC's In HTML Format Walter Houser
Mail failure MS Mail Connector
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Robert A. Lentz
HTML Code List Ceyonswami
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Eric Bina
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Gavin Nicol
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Peter Flynn
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Albert Lunde
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Eric Bina
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Eric Bina
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Bob Jung
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? David - Morris
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Gavin Nicol
Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Tom Magliery
Re: Link style sheets Ian Graham
IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Eric Bina
need BNF for HTML2.0 Todd Littell
Re: Link style sheets Terry Allen
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Mike Meyer
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Albert Lunde
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Craig Hubley
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Craig Hubley
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Craig Hubley
HyTime Application Development Guide Ralph Ferris
Re: UL & OL: labels Bert Bos
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Bert Bos
Re: Displaying HEAD info Murray Maloney
Re: Our Friends REL and REV Ian Graham
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Albert Lunde
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Albert Lunde
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Martin J Duerst
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Bert Bos
Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Tom Casey
Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Albert Lunde
Re: Displaying HEAD info Mike Meyer
Re: Displaying HEAD info David - Morris
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Displaying HEAD info Michael J Hannah
Re: Our Friends REL and REV Ian Graham
UL & OL: labels Peter Flynn
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
GET vs POST Peter Flynn
Re: Our Friends REL and REV Murray Maloney
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Our Friends REL and REV Ian Graham
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Re: Displaying HEAD info Ron Daniel Jr.
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Ian Graham
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Albert Lunde
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Displaying HEAD info weibel@oclc.org
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Murray Maloney
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Bert Bos
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Displaying HEAD info [was REL/REV/links] Michael J Hannah
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Dan Connolly
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Murray Maloney
Re: A User's Opinion Gavin Nicol
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Craig Hubley
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] lee@sq.com
Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Joe English
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Joe English
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Ned Freed
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: ENQIREY Peter Flynn
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Craig Hubley
Re: REL="LinkAs:...", supporting link type names as a full URL/URI Craig Hubley
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Ned Freed
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Joe English
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) lee@sq.com
Re: ENQIREY Ron Daniel Jr.
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Joe English
ENQIREY eugene.carr
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Murray Maloney
Re: case sensitivity in tags? Tim Pierce
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) lee@sq.com
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: case sensitivity in tags? Paul Grosso
REL="LinkAs:...", supporting link type names as a full URL/URI Craig Hubley
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Alex Hopmann
Re: Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields Murray Maloney
Re: Sublists for focused topics Murray Maloney
Text version of the draft (Was: Revised language on: ISO/IEC...) Joe English
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Michael J Hannah
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Michael J Hannah
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Ned Freed
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: case sensitivity in tags? Dan Connolly
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
A User's Opinion Richard_J_McWaters@ccmail.ed.ray.com
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: case sensitivity in tags? Paul Grosso
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
case sensitivity in tags? Dan Connolly
Re: Sublists for focused topics Eric W. Sink
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Dan Connolly
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields David - Morris
Sublists for focused topics [Was} Re: format nego in HTML/10646? David - Morris
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? David - Morris
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Maurizio Codogno
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Gavin Nicol
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Gavin Nicol
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
INFO: NEW AND IMPROVED! weibel@oclc.org
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set lilley
Re: Re(2): Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Craig Hubley
How can we prohibit... Roger Price
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Dan Connolly
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Dan Connolly
Prologue Support [was: SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration] Dan Connolly
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Larry Masinter
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Glenn Adams
Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields Dan Connolly
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Dan Connolly
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Martin J Duerst
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Glenn Adams
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Gavin Nicol
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Glenn Adams
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Terry Allen
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Terry Allen
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Larry Masinter
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Martin J Duerst
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set James Clark
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Handling unknown ISO/IEC 10646 numeric char refs Gavin Nicol
Re: Undeclared entities, wierd numeric character references David - Morris
Handling unknown ISO/IEC 10646 numeric char refs David - Morris
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Larry Masinter
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Albert Lunde
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Alex Hopmann
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set lee@sq.com
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Charles F. Goldfarb
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Peter Flynn
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Dan Connolly
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Ned Freed
Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Larry Masinter
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Ned Freed
Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set James Clark
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration James Clark
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set James Clark
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set James Clark
format nego in HTML/10646? Terry Allen
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Alex Hopmann
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: text in the <HR> tag wmperry@spry.com
Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
HTML draft -02 not on ds.internic.net Dan Connolly
Undeclared entities, wierd numeric character references Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set David - Morris
Re: Style/content separation (was: color text?) Dave Hollander
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Postscript woes: help with TeXinfo printing? Peter Flynn
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Amanda Walker
Typed links in HTML 2.0 document: done Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: Scope of the HTML 2.0 document Eric W. Sink
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Alex Hopmann
Postscript woes: help with TeXinfo printing? Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Eric W. Sink
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
moderating this list weibel@oclc.org
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
apology Philip Trauring
Re: ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag Peter Flynn
SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration Glenn Adams
Posting to this list weibel@oclc.org
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag Keith M. Corbett
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag Philip Trauring
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re(2): Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections James D Mason
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Amanda Walker
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
The Challenge Eric W. Sink
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Amanda Walker
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Amanda Walker
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Eric W. Sink
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Walter Pienciak
Typed Links for Glossary [Was: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections] Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Eric W. Sink
Re: New functions weibel@oclc.org
GIFs Peter Flynn
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set lilley
HTML form architecture ? review of DECFORMS/ANSI/ISO FIMS Craig Hubley of CH&A
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections lilley
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set lilley
HTML form feature list ? DECFORMS/ANSI FIMS features in detail Craig Hubley of CH&A
Re: New functions Christian Mogensen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Maurizio Codogno
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Daniel Shields
New functions Herve Muyal
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
text in the <HR> tag Philip Trauring
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Anoosh Hosseini
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Alex Hopmann
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: (Fwd) Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Gavin Nicol
HTML Documentation Peter Bowen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections David - Morris
Integrating STYLE to cover most functional needs David - Morris
Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Marc Salomon
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: HTML 3.0 Eric W. Sink
(no subject) colek@eniac.ac.siue.edu
Newbie has a question (New idea or old?) Charlie Fletcher
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Alex Hopmann
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Eric W. Sink
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
HTML 3.0 bex@ncsu.edu
(Fwd) Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Anoosh Hosseini
Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Lou Montulli
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Eric W. Sink
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Re: Style/content separation (was: color text?) Dave Raggett
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Greg Kostello
Re: Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] Alan Karben
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Amanda Walker
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Dave Raggett
Re: Definition List Headers Dave Raggett
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-charset-harmful-00.txt Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Re: IETF HTML/CALS/ICADD table proposal notes, 5Apr95 Dave Raggett
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Joe English
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Amanda Walker
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set lilley
Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections lilley
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Bert Bos
Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set weibel@oclc.org
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? weibel@oclc.org
Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? H&kon W Lie
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Martin J Duerst
Re: color text? Gavin Nicol
Re: charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set] Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] [LONG. Sorry] Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re:PUT? Daniel Glazman
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Brian Behlendorf
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Eric Bina
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: color text? Lou Montulli
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Larry Masinter
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set] Amanda Walker
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Amanda Walker
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] [LONG. Sorry] Dan Connolly
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Alex Hopmann
Re: color text? Luke
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: color text? Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set David - Morris
Style/content separation (was: color text?) Bruce F. Webster
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
How far should HTML go (functionally)? David - Morris
Re: keyword tag? Craig Hubley
minimal link typing mechanism Craig Hubley
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Debbie Sinmao
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX.... Craig Hubley
Re: color text? Joe English
Re: color text? Gavin Nicol
Re: color text? Tim Pierce
Deployment of Format negociation [was: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?] Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set] Dan Connolly
Re: color text? Lou Montulli
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: color text? Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Terry Allen
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Albert Lunde
Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Brian Behlendorf
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Amanda Walker
test message Operator
Proposals for new features weibel@oclc.org
Re: keyword tag? Dave Raggett
FYI - Dave's move to Boston ... Dave Raggett
Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? lilley
Re: color text? wmperry@spry.com
Re: color text? Dave Raggett
Re: color text? wmperry@spry.com
PUT? Philip Trauring
Re: keyword tag? Steven Fought
Re: color text? Dave Raggett
Re: keyword tag? Dave Raggett
Re: color text? Dave Raggett
Re: color text? H&kon W Lie
Re: color text? H&kon W Lie
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
HTML tables - trying to reach consensus Bert Bos
A question from another list on META Albert Lunde
Yet another table proposal for HTML 2.1 Dave Raggett
Re: color text? Alex Hopmann
Thinking about style sheets Kevin Hughes
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
Re: color text? Lou Montulli
Re: color text? Lou Montulli
Re: color text? Gavin Nicol
Re: color text? Corp Reed
Re: color text? Terry Allen
Re: color text? Brian Behlendorf
Re: color text? Joe English
(Third? lost count) revised Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Larry Masinter
Re: color text? Alex Hopmann
RE: keyword tag? Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: color text? wmperry@spry.com
Re: color text? Lou Montulli
Re: color text? Brian Behlendorf
Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX.... lee@sq.com
Re: keyword tag? Dan Connolly
Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX.... Dave Raggett
Re: keyword tag? Dave Raggett
Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX.... Ian Graham
Re: color text? wmperry@spry.com
Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Dave Saunders
Re: keyword tag? Dirk Herr-Hoyman
Re: Definition List Headers Dave Saunders
RE: keyword tag? Steven Fought
Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Dave Raggett
RE: keyword tag? Fisher Mark
Re: keyword tag? Dave Raggett
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Dave Raggett
Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Daniel Shields
Revised Draft [was: character sets harmful?] Dan Connolly
Re: color text? ts
Re: color text? Eric Bina
Re: color text? Alex Hopmann
Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Amanda Walker
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: color text? Joe English
Re: color text? [and the cache] lee@sq.com
Re: color text? Tim Pierce
Re: color text? Corp Reed
Re: color text? Eric Bina
Re: color text? wmperry@spry.com
Re: color text? Christian Mogensen
Re: color text? Tim Pierce
Re: color text? Eric Bina
Re: keyword tag? Paul Burchard
Re: color text? H&kon W Lie
Re: keyword tag? Marc Salomon
Re: color text? Lou Montulli
Re: color text? Eric Bina
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: keyword tag? Peter Flynn
Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: color text? Dave Raggett
Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Dave Raggett
Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set Erik van der Poel
Re: keyword tag? weibel@oclc.org
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
keyword tag? Ofer Inbar
Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?] Dave Raggett
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Albert Lunde
How to specify 10646 as document char set Glenn Adams
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Bert Bos
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Dave Raggett
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dave Raggett
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: color text? Gavin Nicol
Disappearance of <dfn>, <u> and <s> Peter Flynn
Re: color text? wmperry@spry.com
Re: color text? wmperry@spry.com
Re: color text? Philip Trauring
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: color text? Debbie Sinmao
Re: color text? wmperry@spry.com
color text? Philip Trauring
Re: HTML/CALS/ICADD Table Prop Harvey Bingham
Re: HTML/CALS/ICADD Table Prop yuri@sq.com
Re: HTML/CALS/ICADD Table Prop Harvey Bingham
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Brian Behlendorf
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Robert S. Thau
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Gavin Nicol
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Dan Connolly
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Erik van der Poel
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Bob Jung
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Erik van der Poel
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Dan Connolly
Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?] Larry Masinter
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: Definition List Headers lee@sq.com
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?] Dan Connolly
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Terry Allen
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Francois Yergeau
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Albert Lunde
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Glenn Adams
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Glenn Adams
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Dave Saunders
Re: Definition List Headers David - Morris
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Gavin Nicol
Tools for RFCs weibel@oclc.org
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Larry Masinter
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Glenn Adams
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Gavin Nicol
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Terry Allen
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Glenn Adams
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Dave Saunders
Definition List Headers Dave Saunders
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Ian Graham
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Albert Lunde
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Gary Adams - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Dirk Herr-Hoyman
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Dave Raggett
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Steven Fought
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Dave Raggett
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Alex Hopmann
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Gavin Nicol
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: Looking ahead and planning Dave Raggett
Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Gavin Nicol
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Gavin Nicol
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Dan Connolly
Standardized links and link types RFC (Was: REL and REV attributes) Dan Connolly
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Standardized links and link types RFC (Was: REL and REV attributes) Craig Hubley
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Dan Connolly
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Dan Connolly
Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Murray Maloney
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Paul Burchard
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) lee@sq.com
Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Joe English
Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Bob Jung
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Brian Behlendorf
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Larry Masinter
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Bob Jung
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Glenn Adams
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Albert Lunde
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Kjetil Torgrim Homme
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Ian Graham
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Brian Behlendorf
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0 Brian Behlendorf
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Peter Flynn
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Peter Flynn
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Brian Behlendorf
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Alex Hopmann
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0 Dirk Herr-Hoyman
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Murray Maloney
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Ian Graham
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Murray Maloney
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0 Murray Maloney
Re: questions about HTML DTD 1995/03/29 Keith M. Corbett
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Ian Graham
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Murray Maloney
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Kjetil Torgrim Homme
Re: Looking ahead and planning Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) David - Morris
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0 Ian Graham
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) David - Morris
ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Glenn Adams
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) lee@sq.com
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Larry Masinter
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Dirk Herr-Hoyman
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Rick Mitterer
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: Looking ahead and planning Murray Maloney
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gary Adams - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Glenn Adams
Looking ahead and planning Eric W. Sink
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Albert Lunde
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Gavin Nicol
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: Widths in tables Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Bob Jung
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
questions about HTML DTD 1995/03/29 Baird-Joshi, Susan
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Paul Burchard
Re: Widths in tables Craig Hubley
Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? David - Morris
Re: Widths in tables lee@sq.com
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: SGML is an _ugly_ solution to an _elegant_ problem [was: Parsing < and <] Gavin Nicol
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Dave Raggett
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-specv3-00.txt Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Re: <TAB> tag Dave Raggett
Re: Named Character Entities for BIDI Texts [Correction] Glenn Adams
Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Gavin Nicol
Re: Comments on html 3.0 draft Dave Raggett
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
<TAB> tag Bernie J Scholz
Re: Named Character Entities for BIDI Texts Glenn Adams
Re: Widths in tables Ian Graham
Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? Ian Graham
Re: ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging James D Mason
Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? Dave Raggett
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Craig Hubley
Re: Comments on html 3.0 draft Larry Masinter
Re: Named Character Entities for BIDI Texts Gavin Nicol
Re: Widths in tables Murray Maloney
Re: Widths in tables Peter Flynn
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Paul Burchard
Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? David - Morris
Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? Dave Raggett
Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Bert Bos
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-fileupload-02.txt Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
DP attribute - correct overrides? Ian Graham
Re: Widths in tables Dave Raggett
Re: RANGE - default value Dave Raggett
Re: More comments on the HTML 3.0 draft Dave Raggett
REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Murray Maloney
Re: More comments on the HTML 3.0 draft Bert Bos
Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Dirk Herr-Hoyman
Re: More comments on the HTML 3.0 draft Paul Burchard
Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Alex Hopmann
Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Paul Burchard
SGML is an _ugly_ solution to an _elegant_ problem [was: Parsing < and <] Dan Connolly
Re: A BACKUP HTML tag David - Morris
Re: Widths in tables Murray Maloney
Re: Widths in tables Murray Maloney
Re: Widths in tables Greg Kostello
Named Character Entities for BIDI Texts Glenn Adams
Re: Parsing < and < Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Tables & BIDI Glenn Adams
Re: Widths in tables Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Widths in tables Kim Adamson-Sharpe
Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Christian Mogensen
Re: Widths in tables Bert Bos
Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Dirk Herr-Hoyman
RANGE - default value Glenn Adams
Re: Widths in tables Glenn Adams
Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Christian Mogensen
Re: Widths in tables Dave Raggett
A BACKUP HTML tag Dirk Herr-Hoyman
More comments on the HTML 3.0 draft Bert Bos
Comments on html 3.0 draft Dan Connolly
Re: Parsing < and < lilley
Comments on html 3.0 draft Brian Gaines
Comments on html 3.0 draft Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se
Re: Widths in tables Glenn Adams
Widths in tables Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Parsing < and < Larry Masinter
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Larry Masinter
draft-ietf-html-fileupload-02.txt sent to I-D editor Larry Masinter
subscribe Jonathan Hirschman
Syntax for mapped files ? Juan Del Rey
Re: Who took the minutes for the HTML WG meeting in Danvers? Murray Maloney
Re: ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Glenn Adams
Re: ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Paul Grosso
Re: ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Betty Harvey
ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Mike Cowlishaw
Re: Parsing < and < Peter Flynn
Re: Parsing < and < Peter Flynn
Re: Parsing < and < Joe English
Who took the minutes for the HTML WG meeting in Danvers? Eric W. Sink
Re: Parsing < and < Luke
Re: Parsing < and < Eric Bina
Re: Parsing < and < lilley
Re: Parsing < and < Lou Montulli
Parsing < and < Luke
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Bob Jung
Re: HTImage wmperry@spry.com
HTImage Peter Flynn
proposal to add a new tag to fill-out FORM Shiping Zhang
Commenting from file E040129T@edinboro.edu
Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Paul Burchard
Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 wmperry@spry.com
Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 lilley
Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 lilley
some questions about HTML 2.0 DTD kawabata@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Craig Hubley
Re: Re(2): SHORTTAGh Craig Hubley
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful James Clark
Re(2): SHORTTAG James D Mason
Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Gavin Nicol
Re: Interpretation of RE James Clark
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Paul Burchard
Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Bruce Kahn/Iris
Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Glenn Adams
Notes on HTML3 draft Maurizio Codogno
Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Daniel W. Connolly
Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Arthur van Hoff
Re: PROPOSAL: Hierarchical SELECT lists (was Re: Redoing Forms) Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Daniel W. Connolly
Re: SGML confirming? Arthur van Hoff
SGML confirming? Daniel W. Connolly
Re: SHORTTAG Daniel W. Connolly
Re: SGML confirming? Craig Hubley
Re: SGML confirming? Craig Hubley
Re: SHORTTAG Craig Hubley
SGML confirming? Arthur van Hoff
Re: SHORTTAG Glenn Adams
SHORTTAG Daniel W. Connolly
HTML info Carl Shackelford
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Amanda Walker
SHORTTAG Glenn Adams
Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Terry Allen
Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Dan Connolly
ALIGN attribute default Anoosh Hosseini
Re: Interpretation of RE Dan Connolly
Re: New look at forms - look at ANSI FIMS / DECForms for spec Craig Hubley
Re: Redoing Forms David - Morris
Re: Redoing Forms Alex Hopmann
PROPOSAL: Hierarchical SELECT lists (was Re: Redoing Forms) Joe English
Re: Redoing Forms Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
Re: relation of ISMAP to URL Dave Kristol
Redoing Forms Richard_J_McWaters@ccmail.ed.ray.com
Re: Review comments re. HTML V2 draft of March 29 Roy T. Fielding
Re: relation of ISMAP to URL Roy T. Fielding
Re: <select> David - Morris
Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously David - Morris
ALIGN attribute default Glenn Adams
Re: <select> Peter Flynn
Re: Interpretation of RE Peter Flynn
Re: New look at forms Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
Re: New look at forms Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Glenn Adams
New look at forms Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Gavin Nicol
Re: relation of ISMAP to URL Larry Masinter
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Ed Levinson
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Larry Masinter
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Larry Masinter
SGML compliance Jon Sears
How to get off this newsgroup? Aimee10221@aol.com
Re: <select> James D Mason
Re: Embedding into HTML [was signature/encryption tags] Dianne Hackborn
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Ned Freed
Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Amanda Walker
Re: <select> Brian Behlendorf
Re: <select> Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
Re: <select> Craig Hubley
Re: Embedding into HTML [was signature/encryption tags] Craig Hubley
<select> Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Craig Hubley
relation of ISMAP to URL Dave Kristol
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Keith Moore
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Ned Freed
Re: Interpretation of RE Keith M. Corbett
Re: Embedding into HTML [was signature/encryption tags] David C. Martin
Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously wmperry@spry.com
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Glenn Adams
Vendors taking SGML seriously Amanda Walker
Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful James Clark
MacHTTPD: ClickableImages: How the hell....? Gabriel Sch?nau Hansen
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Dan Connolly
Embedding into HTML [was signature/encryption tags] Dianne Hackborn
Re: Interpretation of RE Craig Hubley
Re: ISMAP idea (?v4) Brian Behlendorf
Comments on HTML 3.0 Draft of March 28 Ian Graham
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Keith Moore
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Lou Montulli
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Lou Montulli
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up James M Galvin
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Larry Masinter
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Larry Masinter
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Gavin Nicol
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Larry Masinter
Re: Interpretation of RE Keith M. Corbett
Re: Interpretation of RE Albert Lunde
Status of <select> Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Glenn Adams
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Gavin Nicol
Re: Interpretation of RE Arthur van Hoff
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Gavin Nicol
Signatures and Security Richard_J_McWaters@ccmail.ed.ray.com
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Amanda Walker
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Glenn Adams
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Gavin Nicol
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Gavin Nicol
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Glenn Adams
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model lilley
Re: Interpretation of RE Gavin Nicol
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: Interpretation of RE David - Morris
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Craig Hubley
Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Lou Montulli
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Keith Moore
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Albert Lunde
HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Glenn Adams
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Larry Masinter
Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Keith Moore
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Philip Trauring
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Christian Mogensen
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Brian Behlendorf
Re: signature/encryption tags Brian Behlendorf
modifiable HTML Philip Trauring
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Philip Trauring
Re: signature/encryption tags Milton Anderson
Re: Interpretation of RE Arthur van Hoff
Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Christian Mogensen
signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Philip Trauring
Re: Review comments re. HTML V2 draft of March 29 Paul Burchard
Re: Interpretation of RE Keith M. Corbett
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Larry Masinter
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Albert Lunde
Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Larry Masinter
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Glenn Adams
Interpretation of RE Arthur van Hoff
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful lilley
Re: ISMAP idea (?v4) lilley
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Amanda Walker
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Dan Connolly
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: Character Set Terminology, SC2 vs. SC18 vs. Internet Standards Glenn Adams
Re: Character Set Terminology, SC2 vs. SC18 vs. Internet Standards Glenn Adams
ISMAP idea (?v4) James P H Coleman
Re: ISMAP idea (?v4) Brian Behlendorf
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Amanda Walker
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Gavin Nicol
Potentially useful information Joe English
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Dan Connolly
Character Set Terminology, SC2 vs. SC18 vs. Internet Standards [LONG] Dan Connolly
Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Dan Connolly
Review comments re. HTML V2 draft of March 29 David - Morris
subscribe@oclc.org robert hull
draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Dan Connolly
Tables Described Logically Terry Allen
IMAGEMAPS need better description in 3.0 Evan Kirshenbaum
Insufficient description for ISMAP Evan Kirshenbaum
Re: Multilingual WWW Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Multilingual WWW Gavin Nicol
Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Evan Kirshenbaum
Re: Multilingual WWW Francois Yergeau
Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Peter Flynn
Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Philip Trauring
Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Brian Behlendorf
Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Philip Trauring
Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Albert Lunde
Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Evan Kirshenbaum
embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Philip Trauring
Multilingual WWW Gavin Nicol
HTML VWG Agenda Dan Connolly
Re: version 2 or version 3? lilley
version 2 or version 3? Kline, Bob
Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Francois Yergeau
Re: input type=file wmperry@spry.com
Re: Ems in tables Bert Bos
Re: input type=file Peter Flynn
Re: input type=file Gavin Nicol
Re: input type=file Larry Masinter
Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Terry Allen
Re: Ems in tables David - Morris
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Francois Yergeau
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Gavin Nicol
Re: Ems in tables Yuri Rubinsky
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Eric W. Sink
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Ginger
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Gavin Nicol
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Francois Yergeau
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Roy T. Fielding
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Francois Yergeau
Re: HTML table model suggestion David - Morris
Re: Ems in tables lee@sq.com
Re: HTML table model suggestion lee@sq.com
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: Ems in tables Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
Re: HTML table model suggestion Christian Mogensen
Re(2): HTML 2.0 reconstruction done James D Mason
Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Francois Yergeau
Re: HTML/SGML/charsets lilley
Re: HTML 2.0 reconstruction done lilley
Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction lilley
Re: HTML table model suggestion lilley
Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Maurizio Codogno
RE: Re: HTML table model suggestion Tom Magliery
Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Gavin Nicol
Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Bert Bos
MIME and HTML/SGML Daniel Glazman
Re: HTML 2.0 reconstruction done Daniel Glazman
RE: Re: HTML table model suggestion Ian Higgs +44 171 510 8595
html rob taylerson
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Dan Connolly
Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Larry Masinter
Re: Dan's new draft looks good Dan Connolly
Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Dan Connolly
Re: Ems in tables Larry Masinter
Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Dan Connolly
Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Roy T. Fielding
Re: Dan's new draft looks good Murray Maloney
Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Paul Burchard
Re: draft-ietf-html-spec-0{2,3}.txt Paul Burchard

Last message date: Fri 30 Jun 1995 - 19:04:51 MDT
Archived on: Wed Aug 02 1995 - 09:49:30 MDT

Messages sorted by: [ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Other mail archives

This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.