html-wg-95q2 by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives

Starting: Mon 03 Apr 1995 - 06:51:24 MDT
Ending: Fri 30 Jun 1995 - 19:04:51 MDT
Messages: 1431

• Tesi Sirovich - 160295
  • A Multimedia-didactical improvement/suggestion. Wed, 7 Jun 95 11:43:54 EDT
• 361 Lauritsen, x8379
  • HTML 2.0 June 15 draft: Bibliography links to sources? Thu, 29 Jun 95 12:38:52 EDT
  • Use of ALIGN attribute with ADDRESS (html 3.0) Sun, 25 Jun 95 19:22:00 EDT
  • Usability of HTML 2.0/3.0 specs -- element names in TOC Thu, 25 May 95 09:21:15 EDT
• Aimee10221@aol.com
  • How to get off this newsgroup? Thu, 13 Apr 95 10:10:20 EDT
• Alan Karben
  • Re: Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] Thu, 4 May 95 13:58:00 EDT
• Albert Lunde
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 12:17:07 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 23:37:30 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:35:36 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 17:43:28 EDT
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 12:52:20 EDT
  • Re: Whence the HTML DTD [was] Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Mon, 19 Jun 95 13:35:16 EDT
  • Re: June 15 draft -- DL Fri, 16 Jun 95 14:02:14 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Fri, 2 Jun 95 22:07:36 EDT
  • Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646? Tue, 23 May 95 11:22:55 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Fri, 19 May 95 16:33:30 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 01:06:06 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 08:35:27 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Mon, 15 May 95 08:14:24 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Mon, 15 May 95 01:33:17 EDT
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Sun, 14 May 95 15:57:20 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Sun, 14 May 95 15:56:35 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 23:56:01 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Fri, 12 May 95 15:53:40 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 09:38:47 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 09:06:21 EDT
  • Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 01:36:15 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Thu, 11 May 95 12:24:12 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 23:42:23 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 19:37:00 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 02:41:35 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 22:19:55 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 16:13:54 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 13:23:25 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Sun, 7 May 95 23:21:01 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 7 May 95 16:08:52 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 10:39:41 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 12:26:22 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 19:30:27 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 14:21:18 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Wed, 3 May 95 18:01:26 EDT
  • A question from another list on META Wed, 3 May 95 08:09:08 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Mon, 1 May 95 12:09:57 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 29 Apr 95 10:24:47 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 28 Apr 95 16:08:40 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Fri, 28 Apr 95 09:05:13 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 18:32:00 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 22:51:22 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Tue, 11 Apr 95 13:46:38 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Tue, 11 Apr 95 00:56:54 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 15:26:13 EDT
  • Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Thu, 6 Apr 95 17:35:14 EDT
• Alex Hopmann
  • REL/REV Link ideas Mon, 15 May 95 03:19:17 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Tue, 9 May 95 20:20:21 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 7 May 95 22:10:53 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 00:30:24 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 17:25:37 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 4 May 95 22:04:08 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 4 May 95 17:51:50 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Wed, 3 May 95 23:23:54 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 05:39:48 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 17:11:27 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 00:21:07 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Fri, 28 Apr 95 05:43:00 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:03:26 EDT
  • Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Tue, 25 Apr 95 03:56:41 EDT
  • Re: Redoing Forms Fri, 14 Apr 95 16:15:11 EDT
• Alexei Kosut
  • Re: LAST UPDATED and FRESH UNTIL dates Tue, 6 Jun 95 22:58:00 EDT
• Amanda Walker
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 12:56:48 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 10:25:55 EDT
  • Character sets: the last straw. Sun, 14 May 95 18:41:57 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 17:55:38 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 10:36:28 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 09:54:56 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 09:51:24 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 13:53:36 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 11:45:53 EDT
  • Re: charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set] Thu, 4 May 95 01:54:59 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 01:58:34 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 17:39:46 EDT
  • Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Mon, 1 May 95 22:43:56 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 17 Apr 95 10:32:23 EDT
  • Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Wed, 12 Apr 95 22:35:11 EDT
  • Vendors taking SGML seriously Wed, 12 Apr 95 11:13:21 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Tue, 11 Apr 95 10:27:29 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 10:44:13 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 00:41:27 EDT
• Andrew McRae
  • HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: DOCTYPEs Thu, 1 Jun 95 23:57:38 EDT
• Anoosh Hosseini
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 22:10:45 EDT
  • (Fwd) Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 15:50:51 EDT
  • ALIGN attribute default Sun, 16 Apr 95 12:44:23 EDT
• Arthur van Hoff
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 20:16:25 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Mon, 17 Apr 95 19:15:27 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? Mon, 17 Apr 95 15:50:52 EDT
  • SGML confirming? Mon, 17 Apr 95 13:02:41 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Tue, 11 Apr 95 12:37:19 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Mon, 10 Apr 95 19:44:26 EDT
  • Interpretation of RE Mon, 10 Apr 95 13:29:06 EDT
• Baird-Joshi, Susan
  • questions about HTML DTD 1995/03/29 Wed, 26 Apr 95 19:27:44 EDT
• Bernie J Scholz
  • <TAB> tag Wed, 26 Apr 95 11:01:01 EDT
• Bert Bos
  • INCLUDE (was: Re: META) Wed, 28 Jun 95 15:22:09 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 14:19:15 EDT
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Mon, 26 Jun 95 07:07:18 EDT
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Thu, 22 Jun 95 15:05:41 EDT
  • Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Thu, 22 Jun 95 09:31:28 EDT
  • Re: Hypertext links in HTML Wed, 17 May 95 14:55:41 EDT
  • Re: HTML tables - trying to reach consensus Wed, 17 May 95 09:20:44 EDT
  • Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Wed, 17 May 95 07:37:31 EDT
  • Re: UL & OL: labels Fri, 12 May 95 11:06:35 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 10:09:35 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 06:16:26 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 11:23:08 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Thu, 4 May 95 09:54:55 EDT
  • HTML tables - trying to reach consensus Wed, 3 May 95 08:52:34 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Mon, 1 May 95 11:36:13 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Tue, 25 Apr 95 12:32:12 EDT
  • Re: More comments on the HTML 3.0 draft Tue, 25 Apr 95 08:24:11 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Mon, 24 Apr 95 14:46:22 EDT
  • More comments on the HTML 3.0 draft Mon, 24 Apr 95 11:22:11 EDT
  • Re: Ems in tables Wed, 5 Apr 95 05:57:32 EDT
  • Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:53:51 EDT
• Betty Harvey
  • Re: ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Fri, 21 Apr 95 07:16:29 EDT
• bex@ncsu.edu
  • HTML 3.0 Thu, 4 May 95 16:33:42 EDT
• Bob Jung
  • Re: http server which returns "charset:" correctly Wed, 7 Jun 95 13:33:32 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 21:46:12 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Fri, 28 Apr 95 23:02:00 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Fri, 28 Apr 95 22:58:12 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Fri, 28 Apr 95 19:30:46 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Fri, 28 Apr 95 18:47:37 EDT
  • Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Thu, 27 Apr 95 20:50:09 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Thu, 27 Apr 95 19:31:01 EDT
  • Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Thu, 27 Apr 95 19:21:15 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Thu, 27 Apr 95 19:08:17 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Thu, 27 Apr 95 18:06:59 EDT
  • Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Wed, 26 Apr 95 21:25:04 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 21:20:55 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 21:14:51 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Thu, 20 Apr 95 13:32:35 EDT
• Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: netscapism quote Sun, 25 Jun 95 20:53:47 EDT
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Thu, 22 Jun 95 23:53:00 EDT
  • Re: COMPOSITE (was Re: APPLET = FIG) Tue, 6 Jun 95 04:34:12 EDT
  • Re: HTML 3.0 Tue, 16 May 95 05:17:58 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Thu, 4 May 95 02:41:20 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Wed, 3 May 95 17:45:46 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 18:39:18 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 15:09:39 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Sat, 29 Apr 95 16:49:31 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 20:25:06 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:46:44 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0 Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:42:45 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:04:14 EDT
  • Re: <select> Wed, 12 Apr 95 21:00:45 EDT
  • Re: ISMAP idea (?v4) Tue, 11 Apr 95 21:18:50 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Mon, 10 Apr 95 21:16:45 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags Mon, 10 Apr 95 21:13:27 EDT
  • Re: ISMAP idea (?v4) Sun, 9 Apr 95 21:48:14 EDT
  • Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Thu, 6 Apr 95 21:22:08 EDT
• Brian Exelbierd
  • Re: HTML 3.0 Tue, 16 May 95 03:24:23 EDT
• Brian Gaines
  • Comments on html 3.0 draft Mon, 24 Apr 95 04:25:58 EDT
• Bruce F. Webster
  • Style/content separation (was: color text?) Wed, 3 May 95 21:26:45 EDT
• Bruce Kahn/Iris
  • Re: HTML 2.0 Tidbits Fri, 2 Jun 95 12:03:44 EDT
  • Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Tue, 18 Apr 95 11:07:31 EDT
• Carl Shackelford
  • HTML info Mon, 17 Apr 95 11:25:39 EDT
• Ceyonswami
  • HTML Code List Sat, 13 May 95 13:06:58 EDT
• Charles F. Goldfarb
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 7 May 95 01:21:49 EDT
• Charlie Fletcher
  • Newbie has a question (New idea or old?) Thu, 4 May 95 18:08:05 EDT
• Christian Mogensen
  • Re: New functions Fri, 5 May 95 04:34:43 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 18:58:07 EDT
  • Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Mon, 24 Apr 95 14:52:58 EDT
  • Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Mon, 24 Apr 95 13:28:00 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Mon, 10 Apr 95 21:56:16 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Mon, 10 Apr 95 18:49:48 EDT
  • Re: HTML table model suggestion Mon, 3 Apr 95 20:44:33 EDT
• Christophe ESPERT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Thu, 15 Jun 95 03:39:57 EDT
  • Re: Re:More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Thu, 15 Jun 95 03:20:24 EDT
  • Re:More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 10:54:07 EDT
• colek@eniac.ac.siue.edu
  • (no subject) Thu, 4 May 95 18:08:54 EDT
• connolly@w3.org
  • tables, map pages Sat, 24 Jun 95 14:03:16 EDT
• Corp Reed
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 19:26:19 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 20:22:47 EDT
• Craig Hubley
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:52:23 EDT
  • Re: Re REL/REV links Tue, 23 May 95 10:58:53 EDT
  • Re: PIs and deployment Tue, 23 May 95 10:18:04 EDT
  • Re: Re REL/REV links Tue, 23 May 95 10:05:21 EDT
  • HTML Link types - user hint? or hardwired internal browser call ? Mon, 22 May 95 00:23:13 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Mon, 22 May 95 00:06:48 EDT
  • Re: HTML Links and Paths Sun, 21 May 95 00:02:51 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Sat, 20 May 95 23:30:40 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Fri, 19 May 95 13:12:47 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Fri, 19 May 95 04:15:10 EDT
  • Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Fri, 19 May 95 03:59:25 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Fri, 19 May 95 03:52:36 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues Fri, 19 May 95 03:12:12 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Fri, 19 May 95 03:15:34 EDT
  • Re: My x-dead x-body [was] Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 20:00:52 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model - where to standardize ? Wed, 17 May 95 18:48:49 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 18:35:28 EDT
  • Re: Links and Interactivity Tue, 16 May 95 23:28:35 EDT
  • HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues Tue, 16 May 95 05:51:42 EDT
  • HTML link types - treatment of nonstandard / documentary REL values Tue, 16 May 95 04:52:46 EDT
  • HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 04:30:55 EDT
  • Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al Tue, 16 May 95 04:18:05 EDT
  • Re: Re(2): HTML Documents (SGML text) Tue, 16 May 95 02:17:25 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Mon, 15 May 95 06:07:01 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets Sun, 14 May 95 18:26:41 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Sun, 14 May 95 18:23:24 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Sun, 14 May 95 17:53:04 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets Sun, 14 May 95 08:46:25 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Sun, 14 May 95 08:06:59 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Fri, 12 May 95 14:41:55 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Fri, 12 May 95 14:26:01 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Fri, 12 May 95 14:16:21 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Thu, 11 May 95 03:16:16 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 10 May 95 18:27:51 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Wed, 10 May 95 17:59:13 EDT
  • Re: REL="LinkAs:...", supporting link type names as a full URL/URI Wed, 10 May 95 17:37:27 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 10 May 95 16:48:19 EDT
  • REL="LinkAs:...", supporting link type names as a full URL/URI Wed, 10 May 95 03:45:36 EDT
  • Re: Re(2): Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Tue, 9 May 95 05:18:56 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Thu, 4 May 95 00:27:53 EDT
  • minimal link typing mechanism Thu, 4 May 95 00:38:55 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX.... Thu, 4 May 95 00:23:02 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Mon, 1 May 95 14:22:01 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Sat, 29 Apr 95 15:56:58 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Sat, 29 Apr 95 00:21:29 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Fri, 28 Apr 95 00:23:09 EDT
  • Standardized links and link types RFC (Was: REL and REV attributes) Fri, 28 Apr 95 00:04:31 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 23:33:27 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 23:14:12 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 23:04:36 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:34:30 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:30:34 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:23:22 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 12:24:48 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Wed, 26 Apr 95 15:18:26 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 26 Apr 95 05:18:46 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Tue, 18 Apr 95 19:26:12 EDT
  • Re: Re(2): SHORTTAGh Tue, 18 Apr 95 17:42:39 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? Mon, 17 Apr 95 14:46:39 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? Mon, 17 Apr 95 13:35:57 EDT
  • Re: SHORTTAG Mon, 17 Apr 95 13:25:55 EDT
  • Re: New look at forms - look at ANSI FIMS / DECForms for spec Sat, 15 Apr 95 14:43:32 EDT
  • Re: <select> Wed, 12 Apr 95 18:31:02 EDT
  • Re: Embedding into HTML [was signature/encryption tags] Wed, 12 Apr 95 18:23:40 EDT
  • Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Wed, 12 Apr 95 17:57:20 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Wed, 12 Apr 95 04:49:47 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Tue, 11 Apr 95 01:25:00 EDT
• Craig Hubley of CH&A
  • HTML form architecture ? review of DECFORMS/ANSI/ISO FIMS Fri, 5 May 95 06:45:42 EDT
  • HTML form feature list ? DECFORMS/ANSI FIMS features in detail Fri, 5 May 95 06:46:05 EDT
• Dan Connolly
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Thu, 11 May 95 10:57:06 EDT
  • Re: case sensitivity in tags? Tue, 9 May 95 15:57:49 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 15:23:59 EDT
  • case sensitivity in tags? Tue, 9 May 95 14:20:48 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Tue, 9 May 95 14:07:29 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 14:00:43 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 10:55:18 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 17:33:22 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 17:23:17 EDT
  • Prologue Support [was: SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration] Mon, 8 May 95 16:58:24 EDT
  • Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields Mon, 8 May 95 16:11:14 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 15:55:44 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 21:40:31 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Sat, 6 May 95 19:44:26 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 19:15:54 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 18:16:02 EDT
  • Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 21:45:02 EDT
  • HTML draft -02 not on ds.internic.net Fri, 5 May 95 19:52:58 EDT
  • Undeclared entities, wierd numeric character references Fri, 5 May 95 19:46:31 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Fri, 5 May 95 18:10:45 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:26 EDT
  • Typed links in HTML 2.0 document: done Fri, 5 May 95 17:55:04 EDT
  • Postscript woes: help with TeXinfo printing? Fri, 5 May 95 17:16:00 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 17:02:40 EDT
  • SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration Fri, 5 May 95 16:25:56 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 15:45:40 EDT
  • Typed Links for Glossary [Was: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections] Fri, 5 May 95 09:02:51 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 18:16:07 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 13:10:25 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 4 May 95 12:44:15 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 11:00:57 EDT
  • Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 4 May 95 08:32:52 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Thu, 4 May 95 04:26:31 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 03:15:06 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Thu, 4 May 95 03:11:14 EDT
  • Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] [LONG. Sorry] Wed, 3 May 95 21:49:43 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 22:11:24 EDT
  • Deployment of Format negociation [was: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality?] Wed, 3 May 95 19:31:26 EDT
  • charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set] Wed, 3 May 95 19:07:07 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Tue, 2 May 95 12:17:48 EDT
  • Revised Draft [was: character sets harmful?] Tue, 2 May 95 01:20:27 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 01:22:48 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Sat, 29 Apr 95 01:29:36 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 29 Apr 95 00:41:33 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 28 Apr 95 22:18:06 EDT
  • Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?] Fri, 28 Apr 95 19:18:11 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Fri, 28 Apr 95 02:52:32 EDT
  • Standardized links and link types RFC (Was: REL and REV attributes) Fri, 28 Apr 95 00:47:51 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Thu, 27 Apr 95 23:20:45 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 23:20:30 EDT
  • SGML is an _ugly_ solution to an _elegant_ problem [was: Parsing &#60; and &lt;] Mon, 24 Apr 95 20:50:35 EDT
  • Comments on html 3.0 draft Mon, 24 Apr 95 08:53:05 EDT
  • Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Sun, 16 Apr 95 23:44:11 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Sun, 16 Apr 95 07:51:52 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 12 Apr 95 08:30:48 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Sun, 9 Apr 95 11:38:48 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 07:36:09 EDT
  • Character Set Terminology, SC2 vs. SC18 vs. Internet Standards [LONG] Sun, 9 Apr 95 09:52:52 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Sun, 9 Apr 95 08:52:20 EDT
  • draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Sat, 8 Apr 95 15:52:07 EDT
  • HTML VWG Agenda Wed, 5 Apr 95 22:03:17 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:51:08 EDT
  • Re: Dan's new draft looks good Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:50:30 EDT
  • Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:50:11 EDT
  • Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:49:53 EDT
• Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se
  • Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Tue, 2 May 95 04:10:49 EDT
  • html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Sat, 29 Apr 95 06:13:00 EDT
  • Comments on html 3.0 draft Mon, 24 Apr 95 03:04:06 EDT
• Daniel Glazman
  • Re:netscapism quote Mon, 26 Jun 95 06:09:30 EDT
  • Re:PUT? Thu, 4 May 95 03:25:29 EDT
  • MIME and HTML/SGML Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:53:26 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 reconstruction done Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:52:59 EDT
• Daniel Shields
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Fri, 5 May 95 02:54:02 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Tue, 2 May 95 02:57:45 EDT
• Daniel W. Connolly
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Tue, 27 Jun 95 09:54:53 EDT
  • Re: netscapism quote Sun, 25 Jun 95 20:20:17 EDT
  • Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Thu, 22 Jun 95 10:20:31 EDT
  • Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Wed, 21 Jun 95 12:51:10 EDT
  • Re: html.dtd broken? Fri, 16 Jun 95 15:02:09 EDT
  • June 15 draft: INPUT, ISO-8859, SGML references Thu, 15 Jun 95 17:43:10 EDT
  • Re: Latin-1 references Thu, 15 Jun 95 15:38:05 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Thu, 15 Jun 95 15:29:52 EDT
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Thu, 15 Jun 95 15:02:12 EDT
  • Fragment IDs case sensitive? [was: Comments on June 8 draft (long) ] Thu, 15 Jun 95 14:56:06 EDT
  • Hyperlink Terminology Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 16:38:21 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 16:30:46 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 12:24:33 EDT
  • More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 08:44:20 EDT
  • June 8 draft: minor nits. the last one? Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:50:15 EDT
  • Re: Numeric char references Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:47:39 EDT
  • Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:56:42 EDT
  • Re: Numeric char references Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:54:11 EDT
  • Re: How do you include a <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE"> to work? Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:52:53 EDT
  • Case Sensitivity Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:51:29 EDT
  • Re: http server which returns "charset:" correctly Wed, 7 Jun 95 12:41:59 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Wed, 7 Jun 95 11:24:32 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Wed, 7 Jun 95 09:45:28 EDT
  • Re: Numeric char references Tue, 6 Jun 95 14:37:03 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 14:17:11 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 11:39:01 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 11:23:37 EDT
  • Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Sat, 3 Jun 95 10:06:52 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 09:51:33 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Fri, 2 Jun 95 17:16:22 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 17:09:52 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Fri, 2 Jun 95 12:47:08 EDT
  • Dexterm Model [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements (fwd) ] Fri, 2 Jun 95 10:51:19 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 02:29:35 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 01:57:55 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 00:49:07 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Fri, 2 Jun 95 00:34:09 EDT
  • Re: May 31 Draft Fri, 2 Jun 95 00:07:58 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 Tidbits Thu, 1 Jun 95 23:53:59 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Thu, 1 Jun 95 23:19:05 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 1 Jun 95 23:02:16 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Thu, 1 Jun 95 22:55:24 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Security words Thu, 1 Jun 95 22:35:35 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Thu, 1 Jun 95 22:32:15 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Thu, 1 Jun 95 22:31:44 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: *emph() and acknowledgements Thu, 1 Jun 95 22:25:19 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Thu, 1 Jun 95 22:09:46 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Wed, 31 May 95 16:01:44 EDT
  • new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements ] Wed, 31 May 95 15:40:57 EDT
  • HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Wed, 31 May 95 12:52:07 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Tue, 30 May 95 15:41:14 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 10:45:57 EDT
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Tue, 16 May 95 15:25:57 EDT
  • Re: Links and Interactivity Tue, 16 May 95 12:05:15 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Mon, 15 May 95 17:17:23 EDT
  • Re: HTML Documents Mon, 15 May 95 16:19:05 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Mon, 17 Apr 95 19:40:07 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Mon, 17 Apr 95 16:36:39 EDT
  • SGML confirming? Mon, 17 Apr 95 15:18:52 EDT
  • Re: SHORTTAG Mon, 17 Apr 95 14:50:23 EDT
  • SHORTTAG Mon, 17 Apr 95 11:57:00 EDT
  • Re: Multilingual WWW Fri, 7 Apr 95 14:54:28 EDT
• Daniel Wood - FES OPS ~
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 13:54:28 EDT
• Dave Hollander
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Thu, 22 Jun 95 11:40:26 EDT
  • Re: Style/content separation (was: color text?) Fri, 5 May 95 19:06:25 EDT
• Dave Kristol
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Fri, 23 Jun 95 08:47:56 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 10:15:29 EDT
  • Re: relation of ISMAP to URL Fri, 14 Apr 95 09:34:31 EDT
  • relation of ISMAP to URL Wed, 12 Apr 95 17:38:32 EDT
• Dave Raggett
  • Re: Style/content separation (was: color text?) Thu, 4 May 95 14:52:27 EDT
  • Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Thu, 4 May 95 13:33:17 EDT
  • Re: Definition List Headers Thu, 4 May 95 13:29:43 EDT
  • Re: IETF HTML/CALS/ICADD table proposal notes, 5Apr95 Thu, 4 May 95 13:24:57 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Wed, 3 May 95 10:44:16 EDT
  • FYI - Dave's move to Boston ... Wed, 3 May 95 10:40:10 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 10:21:31 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 10:08:55 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Wed, 3 May 95 10:05:22 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 09:57:58 EDT
  • Yet another table proposal for HTML 2.1 Wed, 3 May 95 07:10:54 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX.... Tue, 2 May 95 11:55:14 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Tue, 2 May 95 11:35:41 EDT
  • Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Tue, 2 May 95 06:43:38 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Tue, 2 May 95 05:15:11 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Tue, 2 May 95 05:08:47 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 13:26:10 EDT
  • Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Mon, 1 May 95 12:51:54 EDT
  • Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?] Mon, 1 May 95 12:13:55 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Mon, 1 May 95 11:23:04 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 11:10:16 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Fri, 28 Apr 95 06:35:35 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Fri, 28 Apr 95 05:46:18 EDT
  • Re: Looking ahead and planning Fri, 28 Apr 95 03:54:47 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 12:35:34 EDT
  • Re: <TAB> tag Wed, 26 Apr 95 12:18:39 EDT
  • Re: Comments on html 3.0 draft Wed, 26 Apr 95 11:14:31 EDT
  • Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? Wed, 26 Apr 95 09:09:09 EDT
  • Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? Tue, 25 Apr 95 13:39:30 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Tue, 25 Apr 95 11:35:46 EDT
  • Re: RANGE - default value Tue, 25 Apr 95 11:22:57 EDT
  • Re: More comments on the HTML 3.0 draft Tue, 25 Apr 95 11:01:04 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Mon, 24 Apr 95 13:18:27 EDT
• Dave Saunders
  • Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Tue, 2 May 95 09:25:56 EDT
  • Re: Definition List Headers Tue, 2 May 95 07:38:54 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Fri, 28 Apr 95 14:26:55 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Fri, 28 Apr 95 10:10:07 EDT
  • Definition List Headers Fri, 28 Apr 95 09:45:28 EDT
• David - Morris
  • Re: June 8 draft: minor nits. the last one? Fri, 9 Jun 95 18:48:09 EDT
  • Re: June 8 draft: minor nits. the last one? Fri, 9 Jun 95 17:36:48 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Fri, 2 Jun 95 22:14:10 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Fri, 2 Jun 95 20:47:37 EDT
  • Re: May 31 Draft Fri, 2 Jun 95 20:13:00 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Security words Fri, 2 Jun 95 20:00:39 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Thu, 1 Jun 95 20:53:29 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Security words Thu, 1 Jun 95 14:04:47 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Thu, 1 Jun 95 13:41:16 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: *emph() and acknowledgements Thu, 1 Jun 95 13:18:31 EDT
  • Re: Re REL/REV links Fri, 19 May 95 17:51:22 EDT
  • Re: backward compatibility for links + more random thoughts Fri, 19 May 95 15:29:40 EDT
  • Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal Wed, 17 May 95 20:10:18 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Wed, 17 May 95 19:20:46 EDT
  • Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Wed, 17 May 95 15:53:41 EDT
  • My x-dead x-body [was] Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 14:24:24 EDT
  • Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al Tue, 16 May 95 18:31:34 EDT
  • WG Citation Attribution - a Plea! Mon, 15 May 95 20:38:45 EDT
  • on Why= with keyword REV= et al Mon, 15 May 95 20:04:23 EDT
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Mon, 15 May 95 19:43:01 EDT
  • Re: Definitions of semantic format elements Mon, 15 May 95 14:46:49 EDT
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Mon, 15 May 95 13:50:54 EDT
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Fri, 12 May 95 18:18:13 EDT
  • Re: Displaying HEAD info Thu, 11 May 95 20:46:58 EDT
  • Re: Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields Tue, 9 May 95 13:40:35 EDT
  • Sublists for focused topics [Was} Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Tue, 9 May 95 13:29:51 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Tue, 9 May 95 13:17:24 EDT
  • Re: Undeclared entities, wierd numeric character references Mon, 8 May 95 01:56:28 EDT
  • Handling unknown ISO/IEC 10646 numeric char refs Mon, 8 May 95 01:22:57 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 19:12:46 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 4 May 95 18:58:23 EDT
  • Integrating STYLE to cover most functional needs Thu, 4 May 95 18:38:37 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 00:52:50 EDT
  • How far should HTML go (functionally)? Thu, 4 May 95 00:28:46 EDT
  • Re: Definition List Headers Fri, 28 Apr 95 14:11:11 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:06:54 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 13:49:49 EDT
  • Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? Wed, 26 Apr 95 14:56:10 EDT
  • Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? Tue, 25 Apr 95 15:29:34 EDT
  • Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Mon, 24 Apr 95 20:10:49 EDT
  • Re: Redoing Forms Sat, 15 Apr 95 00:22:04 EDT
  • Re: <select> Fri, 14 Apr 95 01:36:38 EDT
  • Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Fri, 14 Apr 95 01:05:18 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Tue, 11 Apr 95 01:55:58 EDT
  • Review comments re. HTML V2 draft of March 29 Sun, 9 Apr 95 02:20:24 EDT
  • Re: Ems in tables Tue, 4 Apr 95 17:01:43 EDT
  • Re: HTML table model suggestion Tue, 4 Apr 95 16:49:21 EDT
• David C. Martin
  • Re: Embedding into HTML [was signature/encryption tags] Wed, 12 Apr 95 15:03:43 EDT
• David Morris
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 15:18:31 EDT
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Mon, 26 Jun 95 16:23:13 EDT
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 15:53:52 EDT
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 14:42:01 EDT
  • Re: Whence the HTML DTD [was] Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Fri, 16 Jun 95 13:55:48 EDT
  • Re: June 15 draft -- DL Fri, 16 Jun 95 13:04:51 EDT
  • Whence the HTML DTD [was] Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Thu, 15 Jun 95 16:29:40 EDT
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Thu, 15 Jun 95 15:57:40 EDT
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Thu, 15 Jun 95 15:53:31 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 18:27:23 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 17:49:19 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 17:16:44 EDT
• Debbie Sinmao
  • Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Thu, 4 May 95 00:39:48 EDT
  • Re: color text? Sun, 30 Apr 95 08:24:56 EDT
• Dianne Hackborn
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:46:35 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Mon, 5 Jun 95 19:56:03 EDT
  • Re: Embedding into HTML [was signature/encryption tags] Thu, 13 Apr 95 04:09:14 EDT
  • Embedding into HTML [was signature/encryption tags] Wed, 12 Apr 95 06:08:46 EDT
• Dieter Baron
  • Re: Comment Declarations Thu, 25 May 95 09:20:25 EDT
• Dirk Herr-Hoyman
  • Re: keyword tag? Tue, 2 May 95 08:18:48 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Fri, 28 Apr 95 08:22:11 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0 Thu, 27 Apr 95 15:47:09 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 13:26:26 EDT
  • Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Tue, 25 Apr 95 08:17:43 EDT
  • Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Mon, 24 Apr 95 13:55:54 EDT
  • A BACKUP HTML tag Mon, 24 Apr 95 11:49:54 EDT
• Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Mon, 15 May 95 12:40:41 EDT
• donald@mac7100.tau.it
  • tables, map pages Sat, 24 Jun 95 03:51:22 EDT
• E040129T@edinboro.edu
  • Commenting from file Wed, 19 Apr 95 12:35:44 EDT
• Ed Levinson
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Thu, 13 Apr 95 12:16:05 EDT
• Edward Welbourne
  • Broken links on HTML Math page at www.htl.hp.co.uk Fri, 16 Jun 95 10:30:31 EDT
• Eric Bina
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Sat, 13 May 95 12:17:58 EDT
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Fri, 12 May 95 23:15:29 EDT
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Fri, 12 May 95 23:08:45 EDT
  • IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Fri, 12 May 95 17:32:21 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Wed, 3 May 95 23:42:16 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 00:48:50 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 19:48:31 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 18:07:10 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 16:02:45 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Thu, 20 Apr 95 16:39:53 EDT
• Eric Miller
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 14:38:50 EDT
  • META Tue, 27 Jun 95 15:26:11 EDT
• Eric W. Sink
  • FYI: HTML 2.0 Wed, 28 Jun 95 08:40:30 EDT
  • Stockholm registration Fri, 16 Jun 95 08:21:54 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 10:01:28 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Mon, 5 Jun 95 09:23:52 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Wed, 31 May 95 16:41:34 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Wed, 31 May 95 15:02:42 EDT
  • Re: Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646? Tue, 23 May 95 12:11:37 EDT
  • Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995 Tue, 23 May 95 11:35:57 EDT
  • Wet blankets Tue, 23 May 95 11:21:53 EDT
  • Interim meeting? Tue, 23 May 95 10:45:51 EDT
  • Re: Sublists for focused topics Tue, 9 May 95 14:20:20 EDT
  • Re: Scope of the HTML 2.0 document Fri, 5 May 95 17:32:08 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 17:12:35 EDT
  • The Challenge Fri, 5 May 95 09:55:19 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 09:38:17 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 09:02:16 EDT
  • Re: HTML 3.0 Thu, 4 May 95 17:20:44 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 16:50:14 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 15:40:44 EDT
  • Looking ahead and planning Wed, 26 Apr 95 22:55:52 EDT
  • Who took the minutes for the HTML WG meeting in Danvers? Thu, 20 Apr 95 18:11:58 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Tue, 4 Apr 95 10:49:39 EDT
• Erik Naggum
  • Re: netscapism quote Mon, 26 Jun 95 08:38:44 EDT
  • netscapism quote Sun, 25 Jun 95 03:12:55 EDT
• Erik van der Poel
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 00:34:07 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 16:42:21 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 14:49:02 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 8 May 95 17:26:49 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:08 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 13:23:49 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 12:57:09 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 12:34:33 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 23:39:45 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 23:28:08 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 21:36:58 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 01:18:01 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 23:01:32 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 20:47:02 EDT
  • Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set Mon, 1 May 95 12:47:49 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 29 Apr 95 00:11:08 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Fri, 28 Apr 95 22:58:31 EDT
• eugene.carr
  • ENQIREY Wed, 10 May 95 13:19:30 EDT
• Evan Kirshenbaum
  • IMAGEMAPS need better description in 3.0 Fri, 7 Apr 95 22:26:07 EDT
  • Insufficient description for ISMAP Fri, 7 Apr 95 22:10:46 EDT
  • Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Fri, 7 Apr 95 12:28:19 EDT
  • Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Thu, 6 Apr 95 16:46:16 EDT
• Fisher Mark
  • RE: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST Mon, 5 Jun 95 10:24:33 EDT
  • RE: keyword tag? Tue, 2 May 95 06:40:13 EDT
• Francois Yergeau
  • Re: June 8 draft: minor nits. the last one? Tue, 13 Jun 95 09:45:11 EDT
  • Re: http server which returns "charset:" correctly Wed, 7 Jun 95 12:58:37 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 1 Jun 95 15:13:37 EDT
  • Re: HTML v2.0 focus and closure Thu, 25 May 95 11:14:38 EDT
  • Re: Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995 Thu, 25 May 95 11:10:22 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 28 Apr 95 17:23:00 EDT
  • Re: Multilingual WWW Fri, 7 Apr 95 11:57:08 EDT
  • Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Wed, 5 Apr 95 14:26:12 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Tue, 4 Apr 95 09:27:00 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Tue, 4 Apr 95 11:39:10 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Tue, 4 Apr 95 17:32:41 EDT
  • Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Mon, 3 Apr 95 13:50:39 EDT
• Gabriel Sch?nau Hansen
  • MacHTTPD: ClickableImages: How the hell....? Wed, 12 Apr 95 08:43:24 EDT
• Gary Adams - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Fri, 28 Apr 95 08:28:33 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Thu, 27 Apr 95 10:22:26 EDT
• Gavin Nicol
  • Re: netscapism quote Mon, 26 Jun 95 09:25:21 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 11:10:31 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 21:35:45 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 11:05:07 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Fri, 2 Jun 95 22:07:52 EDT
  • Re: Status of WG documents -- 23 May 1995 Thu, 25 May 95 09:19:07 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 12:15:06 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 15 May 95 08:54:09 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 13 May 95 23:18:32 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Sat, 13 May 95 09:45:54 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 18:01:25 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 17:57:47 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 17:53:38 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 19:48:33 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 12:56:27 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 12:31:27 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 12:20:48 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 11:47:29 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 11:36:48 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 11:19:02 EDT
  • Re: A User's Opinion Thu, 11 May 95 08:44:29 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 13:54:03 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 13:53:29 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 11:54:11 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 11:35:19 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Tue, 9 May 95 11:31:32 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Tue, 9 May 95 11:20:50 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Tue, 9 May 95 11:10:54 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 12:17:43 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 03:04:29 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 8 May 95 02:43:11 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 02:39:31 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 8 May 95 02:39:53 EDT
  • Re: Handling unknown ISO/IEC 10646 numeric char refs Mon, 8 May 95 02:36:08 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Sun, 7 May 95 20:43:07 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Sat, 6 May 95 14:37:17 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 10:09:19 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 23:47:21 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 23:35:00 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 23:28:45 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 23:16:23 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 12:13:51 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 02:01:59 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 21:51:20 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 21:47:48 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 21:41:12 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 21:37:32 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 21:34:06 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 21:30:33 EDT
  • Re: (Fwd) Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 21:21:10 EDT
  • Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Thu, 4 May 95 21:05:44 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 13:33:49 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 12:34:08 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 10:26:01 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 09:54:36 EDT
  • Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Thu, 4 May 95 09:51:05 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 09:44:21 EDT
  • Re: color text? Thu, 4 May 95 04:43:40 EDT
  • Re: charset labelling [was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set] Thu, 4 May 95 04:39:12 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 04:30:41 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 04:25:50 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 04:21:59 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 04:14:52 EDT
  • Re: Presentation info in HTML? [was: color text?] [LONG. Sorry] Thu, 4 May 95 04:00:22 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 03:26:05 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 03:04:36 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 19:45:31 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 19:35:44 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 19:21:58 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 18:56:48 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 19:02:15 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 18:23:58 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 18:07:08 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 21:42:29 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 22:07:11 EDT
  • Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set Mon, 1 May 95 13:41:43 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 13:34:22 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 12:24:53 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 12:21:20 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 01:16:19 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 01:09:51 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 29 Apr 95 11:48:06 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 29 Apr 95 04:25:20 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Sat, 29 Apr 95 04:15:24 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Fri, 28 Apr 95 21:18:35 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 28 Apr 95 21:15:13 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Fri, 28 Apr 95 13:49:27 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Fri, 28 Apr 95 12:01:10 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Fri, 28 Apr 95 04:20:22 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Fri, 28 Apr 95 04:07:47 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Fri, 28 Apr 95 03:58:17 EDT
  • Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Fri, 28 Apr 95 03:51:19 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Fri, 28 Apr 95 03:38:48 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 28 Apr 95 03:26:17 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 22:26:18 EDT
  • Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Wed, 26 Apr 95 22:13:40 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 22:03:35 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 13:09:39 EDT
  • Re: SGML is an _ugly_ solution to an _elegant_ problem [was: Parsing &#60; and &lt;] Wed, 26 Apr 95 12:33:57 EDT
  • Re: Unicode browsers (was: Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Wed, 26 Apr 95 11:26:40 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 11:09:08 EDT
  • Re: Named Character Entities for BIDI Texts Wed, 26 Apr 95 02:31:40 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Tue, 18 Apr 95 12:58:51 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Tue, 18 Apr 95 12:41:02 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 17 Apr 95 10:59:17 EDT
  • Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Thu, 13 Apr 95 14:57:10 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 15:11:45 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 12:43:46 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 12:30:49 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 09:19:42 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 09:16:08 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Tue, 11 Apr 95 04:58:01 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Tue, 11 Apr 95 04:51:38 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Tue, 11 Apr 95 04:42:12 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 11:32:23 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 11:22:34 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Sun, 9 Apr 95 11:35:33 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Sun, 9 Apr 95 22:58:16 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 01:39:33 EDT
  • Re: Multilingual WWW Fri, 7 Apr 95 14:35:55 EDT
  • Multilingual WWW Thu, 6 Apr 95 14:24:13 EDT
  • Re: input type=file Wed, 5 Apr 95 00:49:18 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Tue, 4 Apr 95 10:34:10 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Tue, 4 Apr 95 12:19:17 EDT
  • Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Mon, 3 Apr 95 11:06:51 EDT
• Ginger
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Tue, 4 Apr 95 10:56:05 EDT
• Glenn Adams
  • Re: META Thu, 29 Jun 95 17:50:25 EDT
  • Re: META Thu, 29 Jun 95 14:43:26 EDT
  • Re: INCLUDE (was: Re: META) Wed, 28 Jun 95 15:45:09 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 14:39:33 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 13:06:10 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 11:23:40 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 08:33:45 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:03:00 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 17:36:24 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 16:59:36 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 15:45:12 EDT
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Fri, 23 Jun 95 09:45:56 EDT
  • Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Thu, 22 Jun 95 11:36:50 EDT
  • Re: Latin-1 references Thu, 15 Jun 95 09:58:05 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Thu, 15 Jun 95 09:42:22 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Thu, 15 Jun 95 09:35:47 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 10:21:49 EDT
  • TAGLVL Mon, 5 Jun 95 15:48:36 EDT
  • 7.2.1 footnote 1 Sun, 4 Jun 95 11:56:18 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 14:59:40 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Mon, 22 May 95 15:37:00 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Mon, 22 May 95 11:45:59 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 21:23:54 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 18:24:11 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 09:43:49 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 09:34:04 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 21:45:44 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 16:20:34 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 12:52:03 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 12:19:13 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 09:25:57 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 16:33:02 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 13:25:41 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 11:40:24 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 7 May 95 13:28:48 EDT
  • Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 Sun, 7 May 95 12:37:05 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 13:23:40 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 13:17:26 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 18:02:47 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 17:35:49 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 16:29:57 EDT
  • SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration Fri, 5 May 95 13:22:25 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 11:17:48 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 18:58:58 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 17:21:32 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 16:45:40 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 12:24:19 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 11:59:10 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 23:47:50 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 22:30:12 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 00:43:25 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 18:37:37 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 09:32:33 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 14:25:55 EDT
  • Re: How to specify 10646 as document char set Mon, 1 May 95 13:10:55 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 13:03:15 EDT
  • How to specify 10646 as document char set Mon, 1 May 95 11:46:41 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 1 May 95 09:31:17 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 30 Apr 95 11:54:56 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 30 Apr 95 11:33:10 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Fri, 28 Apr 95 14:49:01 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Fri, 28 Apr 95 14:39:26 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Fri, 28 Apr 95 12:26:00 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Fri, 28 Apr 95 10:10:29 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Thu, 27 Apr 95 18:54:46 EDT
  • ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 27 Apr 95 13:49:22 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 26 Apr 95 23:15:05 EDT
  • Re: Named Character Entities for BIDI Texts [Correction] Wed, 26 Apr 95 11:57:27 EDT
  • Re: Named Character Entities for BIDI Texts Wed, 26 Apr 95 10:43:19 EDT
  • Named Character Entities for BIDI Texts Mon, 24 Apr 95 15:56:05 EDT
  • Tables & BIDI Mon, 24 Apr 95 15:33:37 EDT
  • RANGE - default value Mon, 24 Apr 95 14:06:04 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Mon, 24 Apr 95 14:02:30 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Sun, 23 Apr 95 18:46:11 EDT
  • Re: ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Fri, 21 Apr 95 08:11:23 EDT
  • Re: SGML confirming? and HTML conformance testing Tue, 18 Apr 95 08:53:54 EDT
  • Re: SHORTTAG Mon, 17 Apr 95 12:43:31 EDT
  • SHORTTAG Mon, 17 Apr 95 10:27:41 EDT
  • ALIGN attribute default Thu, 13 Apr 95 22:10:48 EDT
  • Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Thu, 13 Apr 95 15:59:06 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 12 Apr 95 11:26:07 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 12:50:22 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 09:53:42 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 09:00:37 EDT
  • HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 00:38:16 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 14:21:57 EDT
  • Re: Character Set Terminology, SC2 vs. SC18 vs. Internet Standards Sun, 9 Apr 95 14:33:36 EDT
  • Re: Character Set Terminology, SC2 vs. SC18 vs. Internet Standards Sun, 9 Apr 95 17:13:46 EDT
• Greg Kostello
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 4 May 95 14:03:02 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Mon, 24 Apr 95 17:59:14 EDT
• H&kon W Lie
  • HTML style sheets mailing list Fri, 26 May 95 15:11:02 EDT
  • Looking for help.....HTML Questions\Feedback Thu, 25 May 95 09:19:53 EDT
  • Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Thu, 4 May 95 06:11:47 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 09:58:46 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 09:39:02 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 17:22:48 EDT
• Hannah Kaufman
  • Draft document in PostScript Tue, 6 Jun 95 16:46:46 EDT
• Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 04:44:12 EDT
• Harvey Bingham
  • Re: HTML/CALS/ICADD Table Prop Sun, 30 Apr 95 01:24:34 EDT
  • Re: HTML/CALS/ICADD Table Prop Sat, 29 Apr 95 20:37:26 EDT
• Herve Muyal
  • New functions Fri, 5 May 95 02:53:47 EDT
• houser@cpcug.org
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Tue, 23 May 95 12:07:44 EDT
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Tue, 23 May 95 12:07:18 EDT
• hshpcg
  • Suggestion for HTML Text Format Elements Fri, 30 Jun 95 20:44:27 EDT
• Ian Graham
  • Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Thu, 22 Jun 95 09:24:41 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 16:05:16 EDT
  • Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Mon, 5 Jun 95 10:11:49 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Fri, 19 May 95 17:20:26 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Fri, 19 May 95 11:08:28 EDT
  • Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Wed, 17 May 95 14:40:00 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets Fri, 12 May 95 17:40:58 EDT
  • Re: Our Friends REL and REV Fri, 12 May 95 09:46:00 EDT
  • Re: Our Friends REL and REV Thu, 11 May 95 17:41:54 EDT
  • Our Friends REL and REV Thu, 11 May 95 14:33:22 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Thu, 11 May 95 12:27:53 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX.... Tue, 2 May 95 10:40:10 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Fri, 28 Apr 95 09:41:59 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 17:18:58 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 15:14:46 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:38:02 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0 Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:03:02 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Wed, 26 Apr 95 10:15:19 EDT
  • Re: DP attribute - correct overrides? Wed, 26 Apr 95 10:05:29 EDT
  • DP attribute - correct overrides? Tue, 25 Apr 95 11:36:13 EDT
  • Comments on HTML 3.0 Draft of March 28 Tue, 11 Apr 95 18:59:18 EDT
• Ian Higgs +44 171 510 8595
  • RE: Re: HTML table model suggestion Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:52:20 EDT
• Internet-Drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-04.txt Wed, 21 Jun 95 16:21:24 EDT
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-03.txt Thu, 1 Jun 95 18:09:28 EDT
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Tue, 16 May 95 14:31:29 EDT
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-charset-harmful-00.txt Thu, 4 May 95 13:28:45 EDT
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-specv3-00.txt Wed, 26 Apr 95 12:23:09 EDT
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-fileupload-02.txt Tue, 25 Apr 95 11:58:01 EDT
• Jack R. Callahan
  • [ANNOUNCE] Pre-Release of WISE: A WWW-Based Software Metrics Tool Mon, 15 May 95 16:58:53 EDT
• Jacob Palme
  • Using the HTML format for e-mail messages and Usenet News articles Tue, 16 May 95 03:55:31 EDT
• James Clark
  • Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Mon, 5 Jun 95 05:54:20 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 1 Jun 95 15:46:45 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 20 May 95 09:38:22 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Mon, 8 May 95 08:09:56 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 14:15:31 EDT
  • Re: SGML Declaration vs. System Declaration Sat, 6 May 95 11:55:59 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 11:31:38 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 11:31:23 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Tue, 18 Apr 95 14:22:25 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Tue, 18 Apr 95 12:52:08 EDT
  • Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Wed, 12 Apr 95 09:38:25 EDT
• James D Mason
  • Re(2): HTML Documents (SGML text) Mon, 15 May 95 12:12:47 EDT
  • Re: HTML Documents (SGML text) Mon, 15 May 95 10:49:09 EDT
  • Re(2): Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Fri, 5 May 95 11:17:02 EDT
  • Re: ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Wed, 26 Apr 95 09:55:24 EDT
  • Re(2): SHORTTAG Tue, 18 Apr 95 13:05:33 EDT
  • Re: <select> Thu, 13 Apr 95 09:20:53 EDT
  • Re(2): HTML 2.0 reconstruction done Mon, 3 Apr 95 17:36:02 EDT
• James M Galvin
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Tue, 11 Apr 95 15:51:20 EDT
• James P H Coleman
  • ISMAP idea (?v4) Sun, 9 Apr 95 18:41:26 EDT
• jarle.brinchmann@astro.uio.no
  • [Q] Links inside maths in HTML3 Sun, 14 May 95 10:17:19 EDT
• Jim Hurley
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Minor typos Fri, 2 Jun 95 18:18:34 EDT
• Joe English
  • Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Thu, 22 Jun 95 02:39:06 EDT
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 14:26:09 EDT
  • Re: html.dtd broken? Mon, 19 Jun 95 18:34:00 EDT
  • Re: content model of HEAD Fri, 16 Jun 95 16:03:07 EDT
  • Re: June 15 draft -- DL Thu, 15 Jun 95 20:36:31 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: <TEXTAREA> content Thu, 15 Jun 95 14:41:05 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Thu, 15 Jun 95 14:15:46 EDT
  • Re: content model of HEAD Wed, 14 Jun 95 21:57:11 EDT
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Wed, 14 Jun 95 20:00:42 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 19:19:18 EDT
  • Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 14:40:58 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 12:50:19 EDT
  • Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:50:42 EDT
  • Re: Case Sensitivity Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:48:47 EDT
  • Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Sat, 3 Jun 95 15:39:29 EDT
  • <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...) Fri, 2 Jun 95 21:12:38 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 18:34:15 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Fri, 2 Jun 95 01:15:51 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Wed, 31 May 95 15:24:15 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Wed, 31 May 95 12:58:35 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Tue, 30 May 95 01:09:08 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 02:55:18 EDT
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Tue, 16 May 95 15:46:07 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 13:47:13 EDT
  • Re: HR and RE Mon, 15 May 95 21:03:20 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Wed, 10 May 95 22:26:54 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 10 May 95 22:25:52 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 10 May 95 16:49:41 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 10 May 95 13:51:11 EDT
  • Text version of the draft (Was: Revised language on: ISO/IEC...) Tue, 9 May 95 19:50:33 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Thu, 4 May 95 13:24:24 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 20:36:42 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 18:22:38 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 21:42:40 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Thu, 27 Apr 95 21:12:04 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Thu, 20 Apr 95 21:13:34 EDT
  • PROPOSAL: Hierarchical SELECT lists (was Re: Redoing Forms) Fri, 14 Apr 95 15:13:41 EDT
  • Potentially useful information Mon, 10 Apr 95 01:58:02 EDT
• John F. Stitzinger
  • Re: WISE NASA WWW Project Management... (my mistake) Tue, 23 May 95 12:57:24 EDT
• John newton
  • (no subject) Sun, 28 May 95 17:49:30 EDT
• Jon Sears
  • SGML compliance Thu, 13 Apr 95 10:32:10 EDT
• Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Fri, 23 Jun 95 11:56:22 EDT
  • Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Thu, 22 Jun 95 02:14:25 EDT
  • June 15 draft by ftp Fri, 16 Jun 95 09:38:20 EDT
  • Latin-1 references Thu, 15 Jun 95 01:30:52 EDT
  • June 8 draft by ftp Wed, 14 Jun 95 22:24:33 EDT
  • Re: Numeric char references Tue, 6 Jun 95 17:52:15 EDT
  • Re: Numeric char references Tue, 6 Jun 95 17:42:24 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 02:19:57 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 01:38:23 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 00:35:32 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 00:17:53 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 17:26:44 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 7 May 95 13:19:29 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 19:03:02 EDT
  • RE: keyword tag? Tue, 2 May 95 16:51:50 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 28 Apr 95 16:57:49 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 28 Apr 95 13:09:21 EDT
  • Re: Looking ahead and planning Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:07:32 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Wed, 26 Apr 95 21:35:11 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Mon, 24 Apr 95 15:37:01 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Mon, 24 Apr 95 15:43:28 EDT
  • Widths in tables Sun, 23 Apr 95 15:42:28 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Mon, 3 Apr 95 22:15:38 EDT
  • Re: Ems in tables Mon, 3 Apr 95 21:45:09 EDT
• Jonathan Hirschman
  • subscribe Sat, 22 Apr 95 10:23:59 EDT
• Jonsm@aol.com
  • Numeric char references Tue, 6 Jun 95 14:03:03 EDT
  • HR and RE Mon, 15 May 95 20:29:09 EDT
• Juan Del Rey
  • Syntax for mapped files ? Sat, 22 Apr 95 06:05:05 EDT
• Ka-Ping Yee
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: <TEXTAREA> content Thu, 15 Jun 95 14:00:46 EDT
  • Presentation methods/media types (was: Java Applet element proposal) Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:49:40 EDT
  • HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: <TEXTAREA> content Sat, 3 Jun 95 23:03:44 EDT
• kawabata@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • some questions about HTML 2.0 DTD Tue, 18 Apr 95 22:27:26 EDT
• Keith Ball
  • HTML v2.0 focus and closure Thu, 25 May 95 09:18:42 EDT
• Keith M. Corbett
  • Re: ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag Fri, 5 May 95 11:50:20 EDT
  • Re: questions about HTML DTD 1995/03/29 Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:48:20 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Wed, 12 Apr 95 15:04:32 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Tue, 11 Apr 95 14:24:27 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Mon, 10 Apr 95 16:15:49 EDT
• Keith Moore
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Wed, 12 Apr 95 17:28:43 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Tue, 11 Apr 95 17:08:38 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Tue, 11 Apr 95 01:21:35 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Tue, 11 Apr 95 00:06:54 EDT
• kennykb@dssv01.crd.ge.com
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Thu, 15 Jun 95 14:22:31 EDT
  • Re: Presentation methods/media types Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:51:13 EDT
  • Re: How do you include a <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE"> to work? Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:55:40 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Wed, 7 Jun 95 10:58:32 EDT
  • Re: How do you include a <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE"> to work? Mon, 5 Jun 95 10:40:37 EDT
• Kevin Hughes
  • Thinking about style sheets Wed, 3 May 95 05:12:03 EDT
• Kim Adamson-Sharpe
  • Re: Widths in tables Mon, 24 Apr 95 15:14:46 EDT
• Kjetil Torgrim Homme
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 17:41:16 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:27:02 EDT
• Kline, Bob
  • version 2 or version 3? Wed, 5 Apr 95 20:22:58 EDT
• Larry Masinter
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 15:09:58 EDT
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 12:58:45 EDT
  • [jkrey@isi.edu: RFC1808 on Relative Uniform Resource Locators] Wed, 14 Jun 95 18:03:21 EDT
  • Re: Presentation methods/media types Sat, 10 Jun 95 02:56:16 EDT
  • Re: Presentation methods/media types (was: Java Applet element proposal) Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:49:16 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Mon, 5 Jun 95 19:34:04 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Sun, 4 Jun 95 20:10:20 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: URI vs URL Fri, 2 Jun 95 01:15:00 EDT
  • Re: Interim meeting? Tue, 23 May 95 12:25:11 EDT
  • backward compatibility for links Fri, 19 May 95 14:45:02 EDT
  • Re: Definitions of semantic format elements Thu, 18 May 95 03:32:39 EDT
  • Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Wed, 17 May 95 14:17:57 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 14:39:47 EDT
  • Definitions of semantic format elements Mon, 15 May 95 14:00:35 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 11:26:50 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 16:42:37 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 09:54:59 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Sun, 7 May 95 23:51:25 EDT
  • Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Sat, 6 May 95 18:19:29 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 22:15:28 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 17:34:20 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 16:11:21 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 14:32:11 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 14:26:28 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 00:04:56 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 23:11:14 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 3 May 95 22:45:47 EDT
  • (Third? lost count) revised Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Tue, 2 May 95 17:01:45 EDT
  • Re: Planning new RFCs! [was: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC?] Fri, 28 Apr 95 21:40:21 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Fri, 28 Apr 95 12:44:37 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 19:41:46 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 13:42:24 EDT
  • Re: Comments on html 3.0 draft Wed, 26 Apr 95 03:50:34 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Sat, 22 Apr 95 17:11:26 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Sat, 22 Apr 95 17:08:12 EDT
  • draft-ietf-html-fileupload-02.txt sent to I-D editor Sat, 22 Apr 95 15:25:45 EDT
  • Re: relation of ISMAP to URL Thu, 13 Apr 95 12:04:46 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Thu, 13 Apr 95 12:01:05 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Thu, 13 Apr 95 11:35:56 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Tue, 11 Apr 95 15:44:05 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Tue, 11 Apr 95 15:24:16 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 14:58:40 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Tue, 11 Apr 95 00:19:35 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 15:41:52 EDT
  • Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Mon, 10 Apr 95 14:21:09 EDT
  • Re: input type=file Tue, 4 Apr 95 23:15:21 EDT
  • Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:51:31 EDT
  • Re: Ems in tables Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:50:46 EDT
• lee@sq.com
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 22:21:24 EDT
  • Re: content model of HEAD Mon, 19 Jun 95 15:28:26 EDT
  • Re: Whence the HTML DTD [was] Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Fri, 16 Jun 95 12:30:21 EDT
  • content model of HEAD Wed, 14 Jun 95 18:56:21 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Wed, 10 May 95 23:13:52 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 10 May 95 16:06:32 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 10 May 95 12:11:03 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 7 May 95 14:23:18 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag, REL, REV, TYPE, INDEX.... Tue, 2 May 95 12:45:58 EDT
  • Re: color text? [and the cache] Mon, 1 May 95 20:53:52 EDT
  • Re: Definition List Headers Fri, 28 Apr 95 19:37:21 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 22:58:17 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 13:42:52 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Wed, 26 Apr 95 14:08:57 EDT
  • Re: Ems in tables Tue, 4 Apr 95 17:54:06 EDT
  • Re: HTML table model suggestion Mon, 3 Apr 95 23:34:23 EDT
• lilley
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Fri, 23 Jun 95 07:34:59 EDT
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Thu, 22 Jun 95 11:59:07 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Mon, 5 Jun 95 06:39:55 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 Tidbits Fri, 2 Jun 95 06:45:20 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 06:14:52 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Thu, 1 Jun 95 16:18:21 EDT
  • Re: HTML Documents (SGML text) Mon, 15 May 95 11:38:20 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 06:22:33 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 07:10:51 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Fri, 5 May 95 07:01:28 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 06:42:14 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 11:36:04 EDT
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Thu, 4 May 95 11:32:29 EDT
  • Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer? Wed, 3 May 95 10:35:59 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Mon, 24 Apr 95 06:30:35 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Thu, 20 Apr 95 16:23:56 EDT
  • Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Wed, 19 Apr 95 10:09:13 EDT
  • Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Wed, 19 Apr 95 09:41:01 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 06:56:08 EDT
  • Re: partial draft: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 10 Apr 95 10:54:21 EDT
  • Re: ISMAP idea (?v4) Mon, 10 Apr 95 10:53:49 EDT
  • Re: version 2 or version 3? Wed, 5 Apr 95 21:59:56 EDT
  • Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Mon, 3 Apr 95 13:01:46 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 reconstruction done Mon, 3 Apr 95 12:21:40 EDT
  • Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Mon, 3 Apr 95 12:21:58 EDT
  • Re: HTML table model suggestion Mon, 3 Apr 95 12:21:20 EDT
• Lou Montulli
  • Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Thu, 4 May 95 15:54:38 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 20:55:51 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 19:03:21 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 01:35:50 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 01:32:25 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 15:56:28 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 16:58:59 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Thu, 20 Apr 95 16:14:07 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 16:34:47 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 16:19:05 EDT
  • Re: HTML Character Representation/Transmission Model Tue, 11 Apr 95 01:25:18 EDT
• Luke
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 20:30:51 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Thu, 20 Apr 95 17:17:03 EDT
  • Parsing &#60; and &lt; Thu, 20 Apr 95 15:49:23 EDT
• Marc Salomon
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 14:11:46 EDT
  • Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Thu, 4 May 95 17:21:09 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Mon, 1 May 95 17:09:51 EDT
• Martin J Duerst
  • Re: Numeric char references Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:48:17 EDT
  • http server which returns "charset:" correctly Wed, 7 Jun 95 11:50:08 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 12:00:48 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs (fwd)Precedence: bulk Fri, 2 Jun 95 15:56:19 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Mon, 15 May 95 07:56:01 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 07:08:27 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 17:03:24 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 16:18:19 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 14:52:49 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 13:25:16 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 15:44:27 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 07:50:32 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 14:36:10 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 09:32:06 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 10:35:58 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 07:20:20 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 16:07:46 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 11:52:34 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 09:40:37 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 05:43:40 EDT
• Matthew MacDonald - FES ~
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Hierarchical SELECT lists (was Re: Redoing Forms) Mon, 17 Apr 95 19:06:04 EDT
  • Re: Redoing Forms Fri, 14 Apr 95 13:17:51 EDT
  • Re: New look at forms Thu, 13 Apr 95 16:57:42 EDT
  • Re: New look at forms Thu, 13 Apr 95 16:23:48 EDT
  • New look at forms Thu, 13 Apr 95 15:18:47 EDT
  • Re: <select> Wed, 12 Apr 95 19:16:38 EDT
  • <select> Wed, 12 Apr 95 18:04:01 EDT
  • Status of <select> Tue, 11 Apr 95 13:06:09 EDT
• Maurizio Codogno
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Thu, 22 Jun 95 11:05:10 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 12:19:36 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 03:09:20 EDT
  • Notes on HTML3 draft Tue, 18 Apr 95 07:41:03 EDT
  • Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Mon, 3 Apr 95 11:50:38 EDT
• Michael J Hannah
  • Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 13:37:40 EDT
  • Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al Tue, 16 May 95 13:12:43 EDT
  • Re: Displaying HEAD info Thu, 11 May 95 18:00:53 EDT
  • Displaying HEAD info [was REL/REV/links] Thu, 11 May 95 11:19:28 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 19:28:10 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Tue, 9 May 95 19:21:18 EDT
• Mike Cowlishaw
  • ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Fri, 21 Apr 95 05:36:36 EDT
• Mike Meyer
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Thu, 15 Jun 95 13:16:03 EDT
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Wed, 14 Jun 95 20:48:08 EDT
  • Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Wed, 14 Jun 95 19:20:31 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sun, 4 Jun 95 00:25:39 EDT
  • Character markup in HTML3 vs. HTML[012] Wed, 17 May 95 19:05:06 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Sun, 14 May 95 19:27:26 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Sun, 14 May 95 15:56:57 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Fri, 12 May 95 16:37:06 EDT
  • Re: Displaying HEAD info Fri, 12 May 95 01:26:29 EDT
• Milton Anderson
  • Re: signature/encryption tags Mon, 10 Apr 95 20:18:04 EDT
• MS Mail Connector
  • Mail failure Wed, 17 May 95 20:43:56 EDT
  • Mail failure Sat, 13 May 95 16:33:41 EDT
• Murray Altheim
  • (no subject) Fri, 19 May 95 12:07:04 EDT
• Murray Maloney
  • What happend to <LINK NAME="..." ... >? Thu, 29 Jun 95 20:50:12 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 13:19:46 EDT
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Thu, 22 Jun 95 11:26:43 EDT
  • Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Thu, 22 Jun 95 11:12:08 EDT
  • Re: Correct syntax of <LI> tags Wed, 21 Jun 95 13:31:42 EDT
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 16:06:38 EDT
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 15:19:44 EDT
  • Re: METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 13:32:34 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Tue, 20 Jun 95 10:02:04 EDT
  • Re: June 15 draft -- DL Fri, 16 Jun 95 13:58:25 EDT
  • Re: June 15 draft -- DL Thu, 15 Jun 95 21:43:45 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 17:59:16 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 08:23:48 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements (fwd) Fri, 2 Jun 95 09:57:55 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 09:26:49 EDT
  • HTML Links and Paths Sat, 20 May 95 16:49:41 EDT
  • Re: Re REL/REV links Fri, 19 May 95 19:56:44 EDT
  • Re: Re REL/REV links Fri, 19 May 95 16:07:57 EDT
  • Re: Hypertext links in HTML Wed, 17 May 95 20:47:19 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 13:10:34 EDT
  • Re: Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Wed, 17 May 95 12:58:01 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 10:55:38 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - implied behavior of specific REL vlaues Tue, 16 May 95 17:11:54 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 15:39:32 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 15:29:29 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 11:55:36 EDT
  • Hypertext links in HTML (fwd) Mon, 15 May 95 16:03:18 EDT
  • Re: Displaying HEAD info Fri, 12 May 95 09:53:23 EDT
  • Re: Our Friends REL and REV Thu, 11 May 95 16:24:47 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Thu, 11 May 95 12:12:53 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Thu, 11 May 95 09:27:56 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Wed, 10 May 95 12:38:55 EDT
  • Re: Security Considerations re: Forms and PASSWORD input fields Tue, 9 May 95 20:13:34 EDT
  • Re: Sublists for focused topics Tue, 9 May 95 19:54:36 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes -- a new RFC? Thu, 27 Apr 95 23:21:01 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 15:36:59 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:55:12 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0 Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:55:41 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 14:33:56 EDT
  • Re: Looking ahead and planning Thu, 27 Apr 95 11:35:59 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Tue, 25 Apr 95 21:26:09 EDT
  • REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Tue, 25 Apr 95 09:55:32 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Mon, 24 Apr 95 19:43:12 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Mon, 24 Apr 95 19:15:40 EDT
  • Re: Who took the minutes for the HTML WG meeting in Danvers? Fri, 21 Apr 95 10:21:40 EDT
  • Re: Dan's new draft looks good Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:49:07 EDT
• Ned Freed
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sun, 14 May 95 17:10:32 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 13 May 95 21:50:33 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 13 May 95 21:46:45 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 20:02:12 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 10 May 95 16:56:54 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Tue, 9 May 95 18:59:10 EDT
  • Re: Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Sat, 6 May 95 18:25:54 EDT
  • Numeric character references and ISO-2022 (was: ISO/IEC 10646 as Sat, 6 May 95 17:20:50 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Wed, 12 Apr 95 23:42:14 EDT
  • Re: Registration of new Media Type multipart/form-data Wed, 12 Apr 95 14:53:50 EDT
• Ofer Inbar
  • keyword tag? Mon, 1 May 95 12:14:37 EDT
• Operator
  • test message Wed, 3 May 1995 15:32:17 -0600
• Paul Burchard
  • Re: COMPOSITE (was Re: APPLET = FIG) Wed, 7 Jun 95 05:54:44 EDT
  • COMPOSITE (was Re: APPLET = FIG) Mon, 5 Jun 95 20:48:19 EDT
  • Re: APPLET = FIG (was Re: Java Applet element proposal) Sun, 4 Jun 95 04:12:40 EDT
  • APPLET = FIG (was Re: Java Applet element proposal) Fri, 2 Jun 95 21:09:13 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Security words Thu, 1 Jun 95 22:58:46 EDT
  • Re [LAST CALL]: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Thu, 1 Jun 95 22:36:07 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Thu, 1 Jun 95 21:22:57 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Thu, 1 Jun 95 14:02:57 EDT
  • Re: HTML link types - how much must be specified in the standard ? Tue, 16 May 95 15:35:59 EDT
  • Links and Interactivity Tue, 16 May 95 03:30:46 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Mon, 1 May 95 17:45:17 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 23:07:54 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Wed, 26 Apr 95 16:01:23 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Tue, 25 Apr 95 15:42:10 EDT
  • Re: More comments on the HTML 3.0 draft Tue, 25 Apr 95 04:27:25 EDT
  • Re: A BACKUP HTML tag Tue, 25 Apr 95 03:44:01 EDT
  • Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Wed, 19 Apr 95 12:15:31 EDT
  • Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Tue, 18 Apr 95 11:56:58 EDT
  • Re: Review comments re. HTML V2 draft of March 29 Mon, 10 Apr 95 16:19:45 EDT
  • Re: HTML/SGML/charsets Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:48:48 EDT
  • Re: draft-ietf-html-spec-0{2,3}.txt Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:48:29 EDT
• Paul Grosso
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Thu, 22 Jun 95 10:46:00 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Thu, 25 May 95 11:11:06 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Mon, 22 May 95 13:33:33 EDT
  • Re: case sensitivity in tags? Wed, 10 May 95 07:14:22 EDT
  • Re: case sensitivity in tags? Tue, 9 May 95 15:08:03 EDT
  • Re: ISO techniques for Mathematics tagging Fri, 21 Apr 95 07:43:57 EDT
• Peter Bowen
  • HTML Documentation Thu, 4 May 95 19:34:05 EDT
• Peter Flynn
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 19:16:52 EDT
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Fri, 23 Jun 95 12:14:45 EDT
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Sun, 18 Jun 95 21:30:31 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Sun, 18 Jun 95 21:26:53 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Sun, 18 Jun 95 16:12:30 EDT
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Thu, 15 Jun 95 04:56:20 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Thu, 15 Jun 95 04:27:55 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 20:34:41 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 19:25:36 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 19:01:38 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:47:47 EDT
  • Re: Numeric char references Thu, 8 Jun 95 10:47:15 EDT
  • Re: LAST UPDATED and FRESH UNTIL dates Wed, 7 Jun 95 04:23:01 EDT
  • HTML 2.0 DTD Sun, 4 Jun 95 20:22:40 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements Fri, 2 Jun 95 20:41:01 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Thu, 1 Jun 95 20:46:39 EDT
  • May 31 Draft Thu, 1 Jun 95 20:42:40 EDT
  • Re: new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Wed, 31 May 95 19:48:07 EDT
  • Re: new Postscript: 8.5x11 [was: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Wed, 31 May 95 16:46:17 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Tue, 23 May 95 11:41:43 EDT
  • Re: WG Citation Attribution - a Plea! Tue, 16 May 95 03:59:26 EDT
  • Re: on Why= with keyword REV= et al Tue, 16 May 95 03:55:53 EDT
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Sat, 13 May 95 05:55:18 EDT
  • UL & OL: labels Thu, 11 May 95 17:19:37 EDT
  • GET vs POST Thu, 11 May 95 17:02:16 EDT
  • Re: ENQIREY Wed, 10 May 95 18:28:53 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Sat, 6 May 95 20:12:11 EDT
  • Re: Postscript woes: help with TeXinfo printing? Fri, 5 May 95 18:56:41 EDT
  • Re: ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag Fri, 5 May 95 13:59:40 EDT
  • GIFs Fri, 5 May 95 08:27:56 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Mon, 1 May 95 13:49:37 EDT
  • Disappearance of <dfn>, <u> and <s> Sun, 30 Apr 95 20:18:00 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:38:47 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 16:38:14 EDT
  • Re: Widths in tables Tue, 25 Apr 95 18:21:54 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Fri, 21 Apr 95 01:31:21 EDT
  • Re: Parsing &#60; and &lt; Fri, 21 Apr 95 01:09:40 EDT
  • HTImage Wed, 19 Apr 95 18:43:32 EDT
  • Re: <select> Thu, 13 Apr 95 21:12:32 EDT
  • Re: Interpretation of RE Thu, 13 Apr 95 20:51:26 EDT
  • Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Fri, 7 Apr 95 06:46:42 EDT
  • Re: input type=file Wed, 5 Apr 95 04:17:48 EDT
• Philip Merrill
  • InsignificantTypo man's crazy idea Wed, 21 Jun 95 17:25:41 EDT
• Philip Trauring
  • apology Fri, 5 May 95 14:58:34 EDT
  • ALT text without an <IMG>? Proposal for new <ALT> tag Fri, 5 May 95 11:25:14 EDT
  • text in the <HR> tag Fri, 5 May 95 00:30:44 EDT
  • PUT? Wed, 3 May 95 10:16:38 EDT
  • Re: color text? Sun, 30 Apr 95 12:07:48 EDT
  • color text? Sun, 30 Apr 95 03:29:49 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Mon, 10 Apr 95 22:11:42 EDT
  • modifiable HTML Mon, 10 Apr 95 21:07:07 EDT
  • Re: signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Mon, 10 Apr 95 20:24:29 EDT
  • signature/encryption tags -> follow-up Mon, 10 Apr 95 16:48:03 EDT
  • Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Thu, 6 Apr 95 22:58:53 EDT
  • Re: embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Thu, 6 Apr 95 20:45:42 EDT
  • embedding public-key cryptography into HTML Thu, 6 Apr 95 15:17:39 EDT
• Pierre Desjardins
  • Null partial URLs with fragment IDs: spec vs behavior! Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:54:53 EDT
• postel@ISI.EDU
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Tue, 30 May 95 20:13:28 EDT
• rai@mac7100.tau.it
  • tables, map pages Sat, 24 Jun 95 04:16:15 EDT
• Ralph Ferris
  • Re: Hyperlink Terminology Re: Comments on June 8 draft Wed, 14 Jun 95 20:20:21 EDT
  • Hyperlink Terminology Re: Comments on June 8 draft Wed, 14 Jun 95 18:25:57 EDT
  • HyTime Application Development Guide Fri, 12 May 95 12:59:21 EDT
• Richard_J_McWaters@ccmail.ed.ray.com
  • A User's Opinion Tue, 9 May 95 15:30:44 EDT
  • Redoing Forms Fri, 14 Apr 95 09:28:05 EDT
  • Signatures and Security Tue, 11 Apr 95 10:58:33 EDT
• Rick Mitterer
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Thu, 27 Apr 95 12:31:13 EDT
• rob taylerson
  • html Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:51:58 EDT
• Robert A. Lentz
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Sat, 13 May 95 15:26:35 EDT
• robert hull
  • subscribe@oclc.org Sat, 8 Apr 95 21:00:09 EDT
• Robert S. Thau
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Sat, 29 Apr 95 11:11:13 EDT
• Robert Tolksdorf
  • Q: Where to find DTDs referenced in HTML3 draft Sat, 3 Jun 95 15:24:03 EDT
• roedy@BIX.com
  • LAST UPDATED and FRESH UNTIL dates Tue, 6 Jun 95 22:08:46 EDT
  • conformance with HTML-2, LINT? Mon, 5 Jun 95 21:00:45 EDT
• Roger Price
  • How can we prohibit... Mon, 8 May 95 19:53:18 EDT
• Ron Daniel Jr.
  • Re: Displaying HEAD info Thu, 11 May 95 13:24:40 EDT
  • Re: ENQIREY Wed, 10 May 95 13:59:29 EDT
• Ronald E. Daniel
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 15:14:49 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 16:11:48 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 16:03:49 EDT
• Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: backward compatibility for links Sat, 20 May 95 02:09:52 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Thu, 18 May 95 00:35:11 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Thu, 18 May 95 00:10:22 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model Wed, 17 May 95 03:59:20 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Wed, 17 May 95 01:05:43 EDT
  • HTML Link Type Model Tue, 16 May 95 21:00:32 EDT
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Tue, 16 May 95 17:45:36 EDT
  • Re: Review comments re. HTML V2 draft of March 29 Fri, 14 Apr 95 04:22:22 EDT
  • Re: relation of ISMAP to URL Fri, 14 Apr 95 02:31:29 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Tue, 4 Apr 95 17:14:12 EDT
  • Re: New draft: charset, conformance cleanup Mon, 3 Apr 95 08:49:37 EDT
• Scott W Brim
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Sat, 13 May 95 20:39:41 EDT
• Shiping Zhang
  • proposal to add a new tag to fill-out FORM Wed, 19 Apr 95 13:02:16 EDT
• Steven Fought
  • Re: keyword tag? Wed, 3 May 95 10:15:55 EDT
  • RE: keyword tag? Tue, 2 May 95 07:05:05 EDT
  • Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0) Fri, 28 Apr 95 06:13:48 EDT
• stiddu@di.unito.it
  • Re: A/LINK attributes Tue, 20 Jun 95 09:30:28 EDT
• Terry Allen
  • Re: META Thu, 29 Jun 95 18:15:14 EDT
  • Re: META Thu, 29 Jun 95 17:16:43 EDT
  • Re: META Thu, 29 Jun 95 11:50:47 EDT
  • Re: META Thu, 29 Jun 95 11:54:19 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 10:15:25 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 17:28:20 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 17:15:22 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 16:40:51 EDT
  • LI syntax, Modest Proposal Thu, 22 Jun 95 11:22:29 EDT
  • Re: content model of HEAD Mon, 19 Jun 95 22:51:37 EDT
  • Re: Hyperlink Terminology Re: Comments on June 8 draft Wed, 14 Jun 95 19:07:06 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 18:14:59 EDT
  • Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long) Wed, 14 Jun 95 18:07:34 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 11:23:06 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Wed, 7 Jun 95 10:51:38 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 12:19:16 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Sat, 3 Jun 95 10:43:49 EDT
  • Re: APPLET = FIG (was Re: Java Applet element proposal) Sat, 3 Jun 95 10:37:26 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Fri, 2 Jun 95 19:05:27 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Fri, 2 Jun 95 18:02:46 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Fri, 2 Jun 95 16:54:19 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Fri, 2 Jun 95 11:18:15 EDT
  • Java Applet element proposal Thu, 1 Jun 95 20:02:35 EDT
  • Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Numeric character refs Thu, 1 Jun 95 14:41:22 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link types - user hint? or hardwired internal browser call ? Mon, 22 May 95 14:38:15 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Sun, 21 May 95 11:01:15 EDT
  • Re: HTML Links and Paths Sat, 20 May 95 19:18:20 EDT
  • Re: Re REL/REV links Sat, 20 May 95 09:50:43 EDT
  • Re: Re REL/REV links Fri, 19 May 95 17:23:52 EDT
  • PIs and deployment Fri, 19 May 95 16:17:44 EDT
  • Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd) Fri, 19 May 95 14:51:45 EDT
  • Re REL/REV links Thu, 18 May 95 23:22:14 EDT
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Tue, 16 May 95 17:02:29 EDT
  • Further on new "spec-02" Tue, 16 May 95 15:22:21 EDT
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-spec-02.txt Tue, 16 May 95 15:09:04 EDT
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Fri, 12 May 95 18:14:31 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets Fri, 12 May 95 17:16:05 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 10:34:46 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 09:28:24 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 11 May 95 12:20:14 EDT
  • Re: Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Thu, 11 May 95 11:40:51 EDT
  • Link style sheets [was REL and REV] Wed, 10 May 95 20:36:57 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 11:06:32 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Mon, 8 May 95 10:50:49 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Sun, 7 May 95 22:44:23 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 19:22:33 EDT
  • Re: format nego in HTML/10646? Sat, 6 May 95 19:12:26 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 19:05:53 EDT
  • format nego in HTML/10646? Sat, 6 May 95 10:54:58 EDT
  • Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Sat, 6 May 95 09:48:03 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 11:26:30 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 5 May 95 09:47:49 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 17:34:51 EDT
  • Re: <style> in the <head> or in the <body> ? Thu, 4 May 95 16:45:02 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 15:21:18 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 13:00:44 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Thu, 4 May 95 10:39:04 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 19:55:12 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Wed, 3 May 95 18:00:18 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 19:04:33 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Fri, 28 Apr 95 17:35:56 EDT
  • Re: Charset labelling (Was: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful) Fri, 28 Apr 95 10:50:34 EDT
  • Re: Comments on: "Character Set" Considered Harmful Mon, 17 Apr 95 09:11:56 EDT
  • Tables Described Logically Sat, 8 Apr 95 15:27:44 EDT
  • Re: progress on HTML 2.0 reconstruction Tue, 4 Apr 95 22:57:03 EDT
• Thomas BjurbSigmack
  • Re: Implied NAME attribute for INPUT tag? Thu, 15 Jun 95 04:02:45 EDT
• Tim Pierce
  • Re: A/LINK attributes Tue, 20 Jun 95 10:33:19 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 20:27:18 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 13:17:56 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Wed, 7 Jun 95 12:52:48 EDT
  • Re: case sensitivity in tags? Wed, 10 May 95 12:10:18 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 19:32:08 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 20:41:26 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 18:35:36 EDT
• Todd Littell
  • need BNF for HTML2.0 Fri, 12 May 95 17:22:45 EDT
• Tom Casey
  • Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal Fri, 12 May 95 05:06:00 EDT
• Tom Magliery
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 18:28:51 EDT
  • Re: META Tue, 27 Jun 95 16:42:06 EDT
  • METHODS and TITLE Tue, 20 Jun 95 11:20:47 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 18:28:35 EDT
  • Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional? Fri, 12 May 95 17:40:25 EDT
  • RE: Re: HTML table model suggestion Mon, 3 Apr 95 11:34:34 EDT
• ts
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 01:10:35 EDT
• Vuong Nguyen
  • HTML Documents Mon, 15 May 95 09:56:58 EDT
• Wallace, Jonathan M.
  • Looking for help.....HTML Questions\Feedback Tue, 23 May 95 09:52:49 EDT
• Walt Houser
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Fri, 9 Jun 95 16:53:14 EDT
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Thu, 25 May 95 09:20:47 EDT
• Walter Houser
  • Re: RFC's In HTML Format Sun, 14 May 95 09:43:53 EDT
  • RFC's In HTML Format Sat, 13 May 95 17:31:44 EDT
• Walter Ian Kaye
  • Re: Attempt at HTML 2.1 (tables) Fri, 23 Jun 95 19:02:58 EDT
  • Re: InsignificantTypo man's crazy idea Thu, 22 Jun 95 02:32:48 EDT
  • A/LINK attributes (was Re: Comments on June 8 draft (long)) Tue, 20 Jun 95 02:14:49 EDT
  • Re: More syntax details in HTML 2.0? Wed, 14 Jun 95 22:58:07 EDT
  • Re: Java Applet element proposal Wed, 7 Jun 95 06:50:05 EDT
  • Re: APPLET = FIG (was Re: Java Applet element proposal) Sat, 3 Jun 95 11:45:23 EDT
• Walter Pienciak
  • Re: Last call: Intro, SGML, MIME sections Fri, 5 May 95 09:22:06 EDT
• weibel@oclc.org
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 14:27:58 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 12:36:32 EDT
  • unsanctioned drift Wed, 28 Jun 95 10:31:07 EDT
  • Re: META Wed, 28 Jun 95 07:53:47 EDT
  • Re: netscapism quote Mon, 26 Jun 95 08:48:20 EDT
  • Re: Broken links on HTML Math page at www.htl.hp.co.ukI got a failure report when trying to email ht Fri, 16 Jun 95 12:23:41 EDT
  • acknowledgements Thu, 1 Jun 95 13:57:45 EDT
  • Displaying HEAD info Thu, 11 May 95 12:19:32 EDT
  • INFO: NEW AND IMPROVED! Tue, 9 May 95 09:09:59 EDT
  • moderating this list Fri, 5 May 95 16:49:10 EDT
  • Posting to this list Fri, 5 May 95 12:41:52 EDT
  • Re: New functions Fri, 5 May 95 08:43:26 EDT
  • Re: ISO/IEC 10646 as Document Character Set Thu, 4 May 95 08:01:49 EDT
  • Re: Suppressed content in HEAD: myth or reality? Thu, 4 May 95 07:37:23 EDT
  • Proposals for new features Wed, 3 May 95 10:48:46 EDT
  • Re: keyword tag? Mon, 1 May 95 12:34:34 EDT
  • Tools for RFCs Fri, 28 Apr 95 13:30:53 EDT
• wmperry@spry.com
  • Re: text in the <HR> tag Fri, 5 May 95 23:07:05 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 10:22:24 EDT
  • Re: color text? Wed, 3 May 95 10:17:15 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 16:24:27 EDT
  • Re: color text? Tue, 2 May 95 09:32:36 EDT
  • Re: color text? Mon, 1 May 95 19:35:47 EDT
  • Re: color text? Sun, 30 Apr 95 14:00:35 EDT
  • Re: color text? Sun, 30 Apr 95 12:20:19 EDT
  • Re: color text? Sun, 30 Apr 95 06:50:35 EDT
  • Re: HTImage Wed, 19 Apr 95 19:46:00 EDT
  • Re: Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 Draft 3/31/95 Wed, 19 Apr 95 11:50:46 EDT
  • Re: Vendors taking SGML seriously Wed, 12 Apr 95 12:39:30 EDT
  • Re: input type=file Wed, 5 Apr 95 09:26:38 EDT
• Yuri Rubinsky
  • Re: Ems in tables Tue, 4 Apr 95 06:43:29 EDT
• yuri@sq.com
  • Re: Comment Declarations Tue, 30 May 95 16:10:20 EDT
  • Re: Comment Declarations Tue, 30 May 95 12:36:25 EDT
  • Re: HTML/CALS/ICADD Table Prop Sat, 29 Apr 95 22:41:42 EDT

Last message date: Fri 30 Jun 1995 - 19:04:51 MDT
Archived on: Wed Aug 02 1995 - 09:49:31 MDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives