Re: Widths in tables

Dave Raggett (dsr@hplb.hpl.hp.com)
Tue, 25 Apr 95 11:35:46 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ian Graham: "DP attribute - correct overrides?"
Previous message: Dave Raggett: "Re: RANGE - default value"
Maybe in reply to: Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM: "Widths in tables"
Next in thread: Peter Flynn: "Re: Widths in tables"

> In most fonts (and in fixed width fonts by definition), an en is about
> the width of a digit, so in practice ch can be interpreted to be
> exactly the same as en (or 0.5 em).

Thats why I adopted en's throughout the HTML3 I-D.

-- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> url = http://www.hpl.hp.co.uk/people/dsr
Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Filton Road, | tel: +44 117 922 8046
Bristol BS12 6QZ, United Kingdom | fax: +44 117 922 8924

Next message: Ian Graham: "DP attribute - correct overrides?"
Previous message: Dave Raggett: "Re: RANGE - default value"
Maybe in reply to: Jon_Bosak@Novell.COM: "Widths in tables"
Next in thread: Peter Flynn: "Re: Widths in tables"