Doesn't SGML HyTime already specify an abstract link model ?
> features that I wanted to address were:
>
> * A framework for link relationships and link activation conditions.
> * Multiple anchors/multiple targets for a single structured link.
> * Arbitrary length structured URIs and client-side URI modifiers.
This sounds even more like HyTime.
> I'll post an outline here after folding in some of the interesting
> points made in this discussion. As an RFC, I'd like to see an
> abstract link model specified, with "bindings" to HTML and VRML.
I have been interested for some time in seeing if the HyTime model
(which I do not understand all that well) could be reconciled with the
HTML idea of links/anchors/link-types.
> Paul Burchard <burchard@math.utah.edu>
-- Craig Hubley Business that runs on knowledge Craig Hubley & Associates needs software that runs on the net craig@passport.ca 416-778-6136 416-778-1965 FAX Seventy Eaton Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4J 2Z5