Re: REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)

Dave Raggett (dsr@hplb.hpl.hp.com)
Tue, 2 May 95 05:08:47 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Dave Raggett: "Re: keyword tag?"
Previous message: Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se: "Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?"
Maybe in reply to: Murray Maloney: "REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)"

> I still think we should have both REV and REL, even if our standardization
> results in saying some relations are the exact inverses of each other.

Agreed!

I have found <a rev=toc href=foo.html> ...</a> too useful to want to
abandon REV.

-- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> url = http://www.hpl.hp.co.uk/people/dsr
Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Filton Road, | tel: +44 117 922 8046
Bristol BS12 6QZ, United Kingdom | fax: +44 117 922 8924

Next message: Dave Raggett: "Re: keyword tag?"
Previous message: Dan.Oscarsson@malmo.trab.se: "Re: html 3.0 - banners ok - where is the trailer?"
Maybe in reply to: Murray Maloney: "REL and REV attributes (Was: More comments on HTML 3.0)"