Re: HTML Link Type Model

Albert Lunde (Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu)
Wed, 17 May 95 01:06:06 EDT

> * All but one of the messages on this and prior REL and REV
> threads has failed to correctly define REL and REV. In fact,
> almost all participants in the discussion use them backwards.

Woops!

> This is not really all that surprising. All of Dave's examples in
> the HTML 3.0 spec are wrong. The SCO implementation is wrong.
> In fact, just about every single implementation of REL and REV that
> I know of is wrong, the exception being Lynx's use of REV="Made".

Well if Dave got it wrong, I feel a little better...