Re: HTML Link Type Model (fwd)

Terry Allen (terry@ora.com)
Fri, 19 May 95 14:51:45 EDT

>SCO can lobby other vendors to
get them to support the SCO REL values in their own online documents,
but it isn't essential to allow SCO users to read SCO's online documents.
So I don't see a problem with the lack of specifying any REL/REV semantics.

says Craig. This is really unfair. Murray is not "lobbying other vendors"
on behalf of SCO. He's making a proposal, the value of which he has
shown (to himself and some other folks) with an implementation. His
proposal is of general interest. There is nothing proprietary about
it (indeed, he'll probably have to adjust his implementation when
the dust settles). It is not limited to vendors of anything.

Regards,

-- 
Terry Allen  (terry@ora.com)   O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
Editor, Digital Media Group    101 Morris St.
			       Sebastopol, Calif., 95472
occasional column at:  http://gnn.com/meta/imedia/webworks/allen/


A Davenport Group sponsor.  For information on the Davenport 
  Group see ftp://ftp.ora.com/pub/davenport/README.html
	or  http://www.ora.com/davenport/README.html