6.The BODY Elements
1.Banners (<BANNER>)
2.Divisions (<DIV>)
3.Heading Elements (<Hn>)
4.Paragraphs (<P>)
5.Line Breaks (<BR>)
6.Horizontal Tabs (<TAB>)
7.Hypertext Links (<A>)
8.Overview of Character-Level Elements
Information Type Elements (<CITE>, <EM>, etc.)
Font Style Elements (<B>, <I>, etc.)
9.The IMG (Image) Element
10.Unordered Lists (<UL>)
11.Ordered Lists (<OL>)
12.Definition Lists (<DL>)
13.Figures (<FIG>)
14.Tables (<TABLE>)
15.Math -- missing entity names --
16.Horizontal Rules (<HR>)
17.Preformatted Text (<PRE>)
18.Admonishments (<NOTE>)
19.Footnotes (<FN>)
20.Block Quotes (<BQ>)
21.The ADDRESS Element
22.Fill-out Forms (<FORM>)
This would make it somewhat easier to refer to the spec when trying to
decipher an existing HTML document from a third party.
It would also be nice if a summary of the elements, similar to Earl Hood's
annotated DTD, were available as part of the specification, with a section
reference in the text version and (obviously) a hyperlink in the HTML version.
Does this seem like a reasonable addition to the content of the
specifications?
Regards,
Michael Kelsey