> A great proportion of the bulk turns out to be due to the fact that
> the declaration of %block contains references to other parameter
> entities. If we could still get a change to the 2.0 DTD to have
> it declare:
>
> <!ENTITY % block.additions "">
That is moving the goalposts. Will you redefine the 2.0 DTD again to
make it easier to add the 2.2 or 2.3 additions? You would need to add
this sort of construct to each and every declaration.
No, I think it is better to leave 2.0 as it is, otherwise the damn
thing will never get out the door.
This is of course orthogonal to discussion about whether the 2.1 DTD
should be an edit of 2.0 or should include 2.0 by reference.
-- Chris Lilley, Technical Author +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Manchester and North HPC Training & Education Centre | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Computer Graphics Unit, Email: Chris.Lilley@mcc.ac.uk | | Manchester Computing Centre, Voice: +44 161 275 6045 | | Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. Fax: +44 161 275 6040 | | M13 9PL BioMOO: ChrisL | | URI: http://info.mcc.ac.uk/CGU/staff/lilley/lilley.html | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | "The first W in WWW will not wait." François Yergeau | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+