Re: Patches to NCSA httpd 1.1

guenther.fischer@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de (Guenther Fischer)

Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
Next message: Arthur Secret: "Re: CEPES UNESCO DRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE ON WOMEN "
Previous message: Colman Reilly: "Re: CEPES UNESCO DRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE ON WOMEN "
In-reply-to: Walt Drummond: "Re: Patches to NCSA httpd 1.1"
Reply: Walt Drummond: "Re: Patches to NCSA httpd 1.1"

Errors-To: secret@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 1994 08:29:01 --100
Message-id: <9402040724.AA03331@flash1.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Errors-To: secret@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: guenther.fischer@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de (Guenther Fischer)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Patches to NCSA httpd 1.1
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 1702

> 	I got Guenther's patch, and integrated it into my changes. The
> syntax of AddHref is:
> 
> AddHref url <list of extensions>
> 
> I made two change to Guenther's stuff: if the AddHref clause includes
> a ? in the url, the path to the file is added; and the complete,
> unaliased pathname is used, not the path relative to DocumentRoot or
> the alias.
How exact? As /cgi-bin/unarch? its fine. ->
  /cgi-bin/unarch?<real filename>
Do you see other things too ?

> 
> It's running on http://aristarchus.rutgers.edu/www-icons.  Let me know
> what you think.  Note that I haven't changed the way Directory Index
I was looking there, but I don't understand:
How is the AddHref for .Z (is it AddHref / .Z) 

> options are parsed.  Also, I haven't made AddHref available from
> access.conf and .htaccess.  Do you guys think we need to do that?
I don't know, but it would be fine if you have parts of the archives
where you want to interpret files with the same suffix in a different
manner. I don't see it at the moment but, if isn't a great think it
gives you more flexibility.
> 
> I have one question: When LinkIcons is on, how do I make the
> AddHref'ed icons stand out??  Currently, the only difference is a
> rather cheezy icon I drew... :)

Perhaps I don't understand right LinkIcons - I see only the same
reference on the icon as on the filename. If it is so I could miss
this feature. I would reserve the Icon reference for a different
reference as in AddHref.

	~Guenther
-- 
Name:      Guenther Fischer / Institute: TU Chemnitz, Universitaetsrechenzentrum
Phone:     0371 668 361     / mail:      fischer@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de
URL: <A HREF="http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/adressen/fischer.html"> me </A>