Re: proposals for log file format changes

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: Neal Holtz: "Identifying scripts by file extension?"
• Previous message: Bill Hefley: "Authoring tools/knowledge"
• In-reply-to: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: proposals for log file format changes "

Errors-To: secret@www0.cern.ch
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 1994 17:09:03 --100
Message-id: <199402101605.KAA03018@austin.BSDI.COM>
Errors-To: secret@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Tony Sanders <sanders@BSDI.COM>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: proposals for log file format changes 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 410

"Roy T. Fielding" writes:
> Now that people are talking about including the Referer: field
> (a great idea but a lot of text per log entry), I think the original idea
I plan on hashing the data and just including a reference in the log file.
Considering that the number of documents that point to your server should
be smaller than the number of requests this scheme should save you a lot
of space.

--sanders