Re: client local file system access issues

"Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 1994 18:06:06 --100
Message-id: <9402161703.AA05676@ulua.hal.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: connolly@hal.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: client local file system access issues 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 626
In message <9402161651.AA19639@honk.cs.utk.edu>, Reed Wade writes:
>
>
>Is the 'file' URL documented anywhere?
>
>

Yeah, it's in the URL spec. But it's somewhat muddled.

Here's what I suggest we standardize on:

1. ftp://host/dir/dir/dir/file
	and we define the semantics in terms of the FTP RFC
	and/or the MIME ftp access-type.

2. local-file:/dir/dir/dir/file
	and
   local-file://host/dir/dir/dir/file
	again, see the MIME RFC for interpretation

And we support, for backwards compatibility

3. file://host/dir/file.ext
	which means "try local-file, then ftp or rcp or whatever
	other hacks are locally available"

Dan