Re: The future of meta-indices/libraries

"Daniel W. Connolly" <>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 1994 20:43:31 --100
Message-id: <>
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <>
To: Multiple recipients of list <>
Subject: Re: The future of meta-indices/libraries 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 903
In message <>, David Kulp writes:
>> I think a simple "standardised" classification system using the
>> meta-info for Internet resources would make it easy to bootstrap
>> topic curators (or their moral equivalent).  It also conjures up
>> amusing pictures of intelligent clients which used the
>> classification info to weed out (say) unwanted hits in search
>> results - a la Usenet killfiles!
>> Martin
>I agree with Martin.  Instead of relying on information curators to
>organize information in an ad-hoc manner, why not set-up an initial
>very detailed full tree and ask information providers to climb
>this standard tree, hanging their ornaments on the proper,
>accepted branches.

The USENET newsgroup hierarchy is handy. It's widely deployed, with
all the right mechanisms for expanding it, etc. The granularity is
perhaps too coarse, but it's there...