Re: Does HTML today comply with SGML?

vinay@eit.COM (Vinay Kumar)

Mail folder: WWW Talk Apr 94-present
Next message: Brandon Plewe: "Best of the Web Nominations"
Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Does HTML today comply with SGML? "
Maybe in reply to: Rich Wiggins: "Does HTML today comply with SGML?"

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 1994 22:15:51 --100
Message-id: <9404042012.AA05562@eit.COM>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: vinay@eit.COM
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: vinay@eit.COM (Vinay Kumar)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Does HTML today comply with SGML?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 596

Just as a test I had tried an SGML product from a company called
SoftQuad Inc. I had successfully parsed the HTML+ DTD (the one 
available at http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/MarkUP/htmlplus.txt)
using their SGML parser to build an HTML+ Tag File, everything worked
without any major problems.
--
  Vinay Kumar
vinay@eit.com


--------------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 1994 20:45:29 --100
> From: Rich Wiggins <WIGGINS@msu.edu>
> 
> How about the proposed HTML+ spec?  Is it any more or less compliant
> with SGML?
> 
> /Rich Wiggins, CWIS Coordinator, Michigan State U
>