I'll refrain from stating an opinion on REV until I see what SCO has
done with it... they have implemented both REL and REV in their browser
I understand, and I don't want to dump something without understanding it.
This will have to wait until Murray gets back.
> If I interpret the last messages by Dan Connolly and Craig Hubley
> correctly, then it seems that REL is the functor of a 2-place
> predicate, the 1st arg of which is the current document, the 2nd is
> the document in the HREF-attribute, or symbolically: "REL(BASE,HREF)"
That's pretty much how I see it. Is there any *other* way ?
> scheme:/valuepart/valuepart/.../valuepart
>
> (much like URLs, including the rules for relative values). For
> example:
I think links should *be* URIs, a relationship is as legitimate an object
as an entity.
> cooklink:/recipe/expensive
This is not relative, you would be saying 'more expensive'.
> mathlink:/example
This is more like it.
> *) For the moment, the implicit BASE is "htmllink:/", so that
> "previous" expands to "htmllink:/previous".
Yes something like this.
> Both: a global syntactic mechanism and a semantics for one corner of
> that world. (The same is true of URLs).
Better stated.
-- Craig Hubley Business that runs on knowledge Craig Hubley & Associates needs software that runs on the net mailto:craig@hubley.com 416-778-6136 416-778-1965 FAX Seventy Eaton Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4J 2Z5