I think this is good language (assuming we take the option of
indicating future directions).
It does seem like while declaring ISO10646 as the document character set
should cause no problems for existing Latin-1 documents, it raises
questions of interpretation when one goes beyond that.
The kind of questions we've been asking the last few days like exactly
what does it mean to support subsets of ISO10646 and what are the
implications for format negotiation of allowing numeric references
greater than 255 would be better put off to an internationalization
document.
If we put in ISO10646 now, we need to be very focused: we shouldn't try
to solve all the "big" issues .
-- Albert Lunde Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu