Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?

Tom Magliery (mag@ncsa.uiuc.edu)
Fri, 12 May 95 17:40:25 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Gavin Nicol: "Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal"
Previous message: Ian Graham: "Re: Link style sheets"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Bina: "IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?"
Next in thread: Terry Allen: "Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?"

At 3:32 PM 5/12/95, Eric Bina wrote:
>It has been brought to my attention that the latest HTML 2.0 SPEC
>http://www.w3.org/hypertext/WWW/MarkUp/html-spec/html-spec_6.html#SEC36
>says:
>
>ALIGN
> The ALIGN attribute accepts the values TOP or MIDDLE or BOTTOM, which
> specifies if the following line of text is aligned with the top, middle,
> or bottom of the graphic.
>
>
>All browsers I have ever used have always had ALIGN control how the image
>aligns with the PREVIOUS element, not the following one. Is this an error
>or a deliberate change from common practice?

Shouldn't it be both anyway?

mag

--
Tom Magliery ** NCSA ** 605 E Springfield ** Champaign IL 61820 ** USA

Next message: Gavin Nicol: "Re: Revised language on: ISO/IEC 10646 -- another proposal"
Previous message: Ian Graham: "Re: Link style sheets"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Bina: "IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?"
Next in thread: Terry Allen: "Re: IMG ALIGN discrepancy: error or intentional?"