Re: Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646?

Eric W. Sink (eric@spyglass.com)
Tue, 23 May 95 12:11:37 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Interim meeting?"
Previous message: houser@cpcug.org: "Re: RFC's In HTML Format"
Maybe in reply to: Albert Lunde: "Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646?"

>(I'm generally in favor of any language that at least makes it clear
>that use of ISO 10646 is our "next step" in internationalizing HTML.
>I'm also biased toward getting the 2.0 spec out the door.)

Dan owns the document. Dan? Did you ever see the 10646 discussion produce
language that [most] everyone could tolerate?

--
Eric W. Sink
Senior Software Engineer, Spyglass
eric@spyglass.com

Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Interim meeting?"
Previous message: houser@cpcug.org: "Re: RFC's In HTML Format"
Maybe in reply to: Albert Lunde: "Where are we on ISO/IEC 10646?"