Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: Hyperlinking, Forms, Elements

Eric W. Sink (eric@spyglass.com)
Wed, 31 May 95 16:41:34 EDT

> <URL:http://www.crl.com/~jenglish/html-spec.txt>
>
>Could you look over the formatting and let me know if
>it's acceptable for an RFC? (It still doesn't have
>the required page headers and footers -- I hope to get that
>done this weekend -- but other than that I think it
>should be OK.)

At first glance,

The names in the acknowledgements look like they're spaced wrong.
There are 11 lines in the document which are longer than 72 chars.

Line 1 is too long (74).
HTML Working Group T. Berners-Lee
Line 2 is too long (74).
INTERNET-DRAFT MIT/W3C
Line 3 is too long (74).
<draft-ietf-html-spec-03.txt> D. Connolly
Line 4 is too long (74).
Expires: In six months May 31, 1995
Line 1240 is too long (77).
The expression <code>x += 1</code> is short for <code>x = x + 1</code>.
Line 1586 is too long (74).
<p> See: <a href="app1.html#bannanas">appendix 1</a> for more detail
Line 2778 is too long (77).
-- Ways to refer to Strict Level 2: most general to most specific --
Line 2784 is too long (77).
-- Ways to refer to Strict Level 1: most general to most specific --
Line 2788 is too long (77).
-- Ways to refer to Strict Level 0: most general to most specific --
Line 2793 is too long (77).
PUBLIC "ISO 8879-1986//ENTITIES Added Latin 1//EN//HTML" ISOlat1.sgml
Line 2895 is too long (74).
<!ENTITY szlig CDATA "&#223;" -- small sharp s, German (sz ligature) -->

--
Eric W. Sink
Senior Software Engineer, Spyglass
eric@spyglass.com