RE: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST

Fisher Mark (FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com)
Mon, 5 Jun 95 10:24:33 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: kennykb@dssv01.crd.ge.com: "Re: How do you include a <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE"> to work?"
Previous message: Ian Graham: "Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...)"

"Obsolete" has the temporal aspect (antiquated, old-fashioned) which is
interesting but irrelevant as to the CDATA problem of <XMP> and <LISTING>.
"Discouraged" is a better choice, IMHO.
======================================================================
Mark Fisher Thomson Consumer Electronics
fisherm@indy.tce.com Indianapolis, IN

"Just as you should not underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon
traveling 65 mph filled with 8mm tapes, you should not overestimate
the bandwidth of FTP by mail."

Next message: kennykb@dssv01.crd.ge.com: "Re: How do you include a <INPUT TYPE="IMAGE"> to work?"
Previous message: Ian Graham: "Re: <XMP> and <LISTING>, declared content (Was Re: HTML 2.0 LAST CALL: ...)"