Re: Re Dan on implementation

• Mail folder: WWW Talk Jan 94-present
• Next message: ts: "CGI Script and PATH_INFO"
• Previous message: Larry Masinter: "Re: Proxy Servers"
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Re Dan on implementation "
• Reply: lenst@lysator.liu.se: "Re: Re Dan on implementation "

Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 1994 11:11:33 --100
Message-id: <94Feb18.145019pst.2795@golden.parc.xerox.com>
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: masinter@parc.xerox.com
Originator: www-talk@info.cern.ch
Sender: www-talk@www0.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Re Dan on implementation 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Length: 289

FWIW (For What It's Worth), I'm with Dan Connolly: let HTML be a small
context-free subset of SGML. Simpler, almost all the expressive power,
easier to write compliant browsers, and a little harder to write
validators.

(Forgive me if I'm behind, our mail is backlogged a couple of days.)