Messages from Fri, 10 Jun 1994 10:21:00 +0500 to Fri, 14 Oct 94 16:13:26 EDT
- html-ig list is open for business Stu Weibel
- Effective ways to comment on the HTML 2.0 spec Daniel W. Connolly
- [Dave Raggett: Re: HTML 2.0 Call for Review] Daniel W. Connolly
- ["Daniel W. Connolly": Re: That old <p> tag again ] Daniel W. Connolly
- [burchard@geom.umn.edu: Re: HTML 2.0: Review Materials Available] Daniel W. Connolly
- ["Roy T. Fielding": HTML 2.0 spec and the META element] Daniel W. Connolly
- [gvoosten@isou17.estec.esa.nl (Gertjan van Oosten): Re: HTML 2.0: Review Materials Available] Daniel W. Connolly
- [alanb@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Alan Braverman): Re: That old <p> tag again ] Daniel W. Connolly
- [Terry Allen: comments on HTML spec] Daniel W. Connolly
- Proposal: No RE character in HTML Daniel W. Connolly
- Where are Fonts and Phrases allowed? [Was: HTML 2.0 Call for Review ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Levels Daniel W. Connolly
- Obsolete Elements [Was: HTML 2.0 Call for Review ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Anchor name syntax: CDATA Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Where are Fonts and Phrases allowed? [Was: HTML 2.0 Call for
Review ] Corprew Reed
- Information (New Subscriber) Corprew Reed
- Re: HTML 2.0 spec and the META element Roy T. Fielding
- DESCSET Change [Was: HTML 2.0: Review Materials Available ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Hot Metal and HTML Stu Weibel
- Re: Adding new tags (was: Redefining...) Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Hot Metal and HTML Daniel W. Connolly
- for the record Stu Weibel
- HTML archive of mailing list now on-line Ronald E. Daniel
- Review Materials Updated Daniel W. Connolly
- Topic/Proposal/Argument view of review comments Daniel W. Connolly
- When should I expect the bulk of your comments? Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Topic/Proposal/Argument view of review comments Daniel W. Connolly
- Disagree: HTML 2.0 is not text/html [Re: Hot Metal and HTML ] Daniel W. Connolly
- History of html.dtd [Was: Hot Metal and HTML ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Agree: empty P, container PP [Was: Hot Metal and HTML ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Agree: text outside P [Was: Hot Metal and HTML ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Agree: empty P, container PP [Was: Hot Metal and HTML ] Daniel W. Connolly
- whither <u>...</u>? Corprew Reed
- Re: whither <u>...</u>? Daniel W. Connolly
- New Highlighting.html [Was: whither <u>...</u>? ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: New Highlighting.html [Was: whither <u>...</u>? ] Jay Glicksman
- Bill Hefley
- Proposal: Specify character sets by ISO number Murray Maloney
- Proposal: Document use of control characters Murray Maloney
- Seek clarification Murray Maloney
- Seeking clarification-- NET tags Murray Maloney
- Latin 1 is NOT superset of ASCII Murray Maloney
- How do we introduce tables into WWW and/or HTML? Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Proposal: Document use of control characters Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Seek clarification Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Seeking clarification-- NET tags Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Latin 1 is NOT superset of ASCII Daniel W. Connolly
- HTML.html node revision Terry Allen
- Security.html node revision Terry Allen
- StatusMeanings node revision Terry Allen
- Tags node revision Terry Allen
- Re: HTML.html node revision Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Proposal: Specify character sets by ISO number Bill Hefley
- Proposal: Recommend complete entity list Murray Maloney
- Re: Proposal: Recommend complete entity list Daniel W. Connolly
- Perhaps a useful tool? yuri@oclc.org
- Perhaps a useful tool? [Part Two] yuri@oclc.org
- uuencoded HTML2.0.doc yuri@oclc.org
- uuencoded PostScript HTML2.0.doc yuri@oclc.org
- Appropriate uses of the Final HTML 2.0 Document Eric W. Sink
- Re: Appropriate uses of the Final HTML 2.0 Document Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Submitting changes Daniel W. Connolly
- Proposal: INPUT TYPE=FILE in HTML 2.0 Chung Jen Ho
- Headings node revision Terry Allen
- REVISION: Murray Maloney
- REVISION: Character Data Murray Maloney
- Addition: Numerical Character References Murray Maloney
- DISAGREE: Proposal: INPUT TYPE=FILE in HTML 2.0 Tim Berners-Lee
- Where are Fonts and Phrases allowed? Dave Raggett
- Re: Comments on HTML 2.0 document/DTD Daniel W. Connolly
- HTextArea form element Eric W. Sink
- Re: New Highlighting.html Bill Hefley
- Re: HTextArea form element Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: New Highlighting.html Murray Maloney
- Time to Reorg the Doc? [Was: HTextArea form element ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Time to Reorg the Doc? [Was: HTextArea form element ] Bill Hefley
- Embarking on a rewrite Daniel W. Connolly
- Conformance Testing [Was: Time to Reorg the Doc?] Daniel W. Connolly
- Digest of Tim's mail Tim Berners-Lee
- IETF stuff [Was: Digest of Tim's mail ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: IETF stuff [Was: Digest of Tim's mail ] Bill Hefley
- HTML 2.0 Scope [Was: Digest of Tim's mail ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: HTML 2.0 Scope yuri@oclc.org
- Re: HTML 2.0 Scope Daniel W. Connolly
- subscriptions and bounce-o-grams Stu Weibel
- open submissions to html-ig Stu Weibel
- HTML and IETF Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: HTML and IETF Jay Glicksman
- IETF meeting schedule Eric W. Sink
- HTML BOF Tim Berners-Lee
- Paul Burchard on HTML 2.0 FORMs Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Paul Burchard on HTML 2.0 FORMs Daniel W. Connolly
- IETF Attendance Stu Weibel
- Proposal: Registerd FPI for HTML public text Daniel W. Connolly
- HTML BOF is Tuesday Tim Berners-Lee
- HTML, SGL Open and IETF Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: HTML BOF is Tuesday Daniel W. Connolly
- Reviewers List for HTML Specification Karen Muldrow
- Re: HTML checker and specification Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: HTML checker and specification Daniel W. Connolly
- AUDIO and SCRIBBLE Karen Muldrow
- unordered lists in HTML2.0 Eduardo Gutentag
- ANNOUNCE: HaL Interactive HTML Validation Service Daniel W. Connolly
- <!DOCTYPE ...> required for HTML 2.0? Daniel W. Connolly
- Testing headers Daniel W. Connolly
- Initial meeting on Monday, July 25 (was Re: HTML BOF is Tuesday) Murray Maloney
- Re: <!DOCTYPE ...> required for HTML 2.0? Jay Glicksman
- I'll be in Toronto Eric W. Sink
- Hotels in Toronto Murray Maloney
- Re: HTML2 spec (mostly typos) Daniel W. Connolly
- Re[2]: HTML2 spec (mostly typos) Karen Muldrow
- Count me in for Toronto Daniel W. Connolly
- Attendees list for Monday meeting at SCO Murray Maloney
- thanks, Murray Stu Weibel
- Near-final revision of 2.0 HTML spec available. Daniel W. Connolly
- correction Eduardo Gutentag
- the latest spec Stu Weibel
- IETF HTML WOrking Group List Stu Weibel
- Re: IETF HTML WOrking Group List Daniel W. Connolly
- updated intro file Stu Weibel
- Proposal: ALT text for IMG does not allow carriage returns Eric W. Sink
- Re: Proposal: ALT text for IMG does not allow carriage returns Daniel W. Connolly
- HTML Specifications Clarification on TYPE=IMAGE Lyn Kennedy
- Clarification requested for necessity of </A> Eric W. Sink
- Re: Clarification requested for necessity of </A> Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: FORM and INPUT elements Daniel W. Connolly
- Postscript version of July 1994 HTML 2.0 doc available by HTTP Daniel W. Connolly
- HTML 2.0 editing [Was: Programming languages for remote agents ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Minor corrections to the new HTML 2.0 draft spec (fwd) Karen Muldrow
- Re: Release of HTML 2.0 document for editing MESSAGE AGENT
- Re: Release of HTML 2.0 document for editing Daniel W. Connolly
- HTML 2.0 spec editing Eric W. Sink
- Re: HTML 2.0 spec editing Daniel W. Connolly
- erics, mike Eric W. Sink
- HTML 2.0 Editing Eric W. Sink
- Re: erics, mike - OOPS! Eric W. Sink
- Obsolete elements -- trying again Leo _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Peace is not something you win. Peace is
- Re: Obsolete elements -- trying again Daniel W. Connolly
- Clarify that special character representations are case-sensitive? Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Clarify that special character representations are case-sensitive? Daniel W. Connolly
- New Topic: HTML and the Visually Impaired [long] Yuri Rubinsky
- Re: New Topic: HTML and the Visually Impaired [long] Daniel W. Connolly
- MIME types Peter Flynn
- Meetings at Web Conference in October Yuri Rubinsky
- html and tables Brigitte Pihulak
- HTML 2.0 specification David C. Martin
- Re: HTML 2.0 specification Daniel W. Connolly
- "current practice" Larry Masinter
- EMBED (Re: HTML 2.0 specification) lee@sq.com
- HTML 2.0 editing status Mike Knezovich
- HTML and ICAD: raman@crl.dec.com
- Re: HTML 2.0 editing status Daniel W. Connolly
- Proposed DTD Names, Structure [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Reconstruct links? [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Proposed DTD Names, Structure [Was: HTML 2.0 editing status ] Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Proposed DTD Names, Structure Dave Raggett
- Re: HTML 3.0 standardization Eric W. Sink
- Presentation at Conference Yuri Rubinsky
- Re: Presentation at Conference Daniel W. Connolly
- Tim BL on for HTML session Yuri Rubinsky
- ICADD elements in HTML Terry Allen
- <graph> Tom Magliery
- Re: ICADD elements in HTML Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Comments on HTML 2.0 DTD Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Comments on HTML 2.0 DTD Terry Allen
- The transition to ICADD Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: HTML 3.0 Process Dave Raggett
- Staying on Task weibel@oclc.org
- Users seem happy with the present HTML 2.0 DTD Daniel W. Connolly
- 3in1 HTML dtd Terry Allen
- The META element Roy T. Fielding
- Re: The META element Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: SGML, HTML and CS: Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Form Errata in Spec Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Prescriptive means?? Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: List Item (LI) Suggestion Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Tags inside themselves?? Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: List Item (LI) Suggestion Peter Flynn
- Re: SGML, HTML and CS: Peter Flynn
- Re: Tags inside themselves?? Murray Maloney
- Re: SGML, HTML and CS Larry Masinter
- need to check subscription on www-html Roy T. Fielding
- Prescriptive vs 'Obsolete' Stan Newton
- Re: Tags inside themselves? Stan Newton
- LI attributes lee@sq.com
- Re: LI attributes Daniel W. Connolly
- STRIKE tag is proposed, what about INSERT? Glenn Randers-Pehrson ARL-WTD-TED-TIB
- Comment on HTML 2.0 lenst@lysator.liu.se
- Issue tracking for HTML 2.0 document (HyperNews?) Daniel W. Connolly
- HTML 2.0 issues Daniel LaLiberte
- HTML-WG Ronald E. Daniel
- Re: Issue tracking for HTML 2.0 document (HyperNews?) Daniel W. Connolly
- Agenda for Chicago meeting [Was: Issue tracking for HTML 2.0 document (HyperNews?) ] Daniel W. Connolly
- Entities lee@sq.com
- Re: Entities Daniel W. Connolly
- A's content model Terry Allen
- Re: A's content model Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Agenda for Chicago meeting Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Agenda for Chicago meeting (+ misc) Eric W. Sink
- Character Set Murray Maloney
- Character Data Murray Maloney
- Numeric Character References Murray Maloney
- HTML 2.0 Mike Knezovich
- Murray's Files Corprew Reed
- Re: HTML 2.0 Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Character Data Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Agenda for Chicago meeting (+ misc) Roy T. Fielding
- <Img Alt='...'> Jeff Suttor
- ERROR(?) in content declarations for character tags Earl Hood
- Re: ERROR(?) in content declarations for character tags Earl Hood
- File upload in HTML forms Ernesto Nebel
- Updated DTD to address outstanding issues Daniel W. Connolly
- marked section in new HTML DTDs Terry Allen
- HTML DTDs, 2 minor bugs Terry Allen
- Do we really care about levels? Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: marked section in new HTML DTDs Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Do we really care about levels? Roy T. Fielding
- HTML empty A (was marked sections) Terry Allen
- I won't be in Chicago: we're having a baby Daniel W. Connolly
- [eric@admin.avalanche.com: HTML Committee] Larry Masinter
- HTML-WG and December IETF meeting? Dave Raggett
- html 2.0 question: raman@crl.dec.com
- OK, how about Monday? Eric W. Sink
- Monday Eric W. Sink
- Re: Monday Roy T. Fielding
- New (specific) suggestion for Monday time Tom Magliery
- Proposed HTML Table Model Yuri Rubinsky
- Proposed HTML Table Model (real one) Yuri Rubinsky
- Proposed HTML/ICADD Table Model Level Two Yuri Rubinsky
- Reality Check for HTML 2 RFC Eric W. Sink
- Re: Reality Check for HTML 2 RFC Daniel W. Connolly
- DTD Level 2 nit CN=Bruce Kahn/O=Iris@IRIS
- <PLAINTEXT> clarification [Was: DTD Level 2 nit ] Daniel W. Connolly
- The RFC will be really long Eric W. Sink
- Re: <pre> Daniel W. Connolly
- Room has been reserved Tom Magliery
- Help getting back on www-html, please? Murray Maloney
- Re: <pre> Peter Flynn
- [Ad.Irvine@queens-belfast.ac.uk: &cx; in HTML+ ?] Daniel W. Connolly
- Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML 2.0 Eric W. Sink
- Perceived Consensus: The META element stays in the Proposed section Eric W. Sink
- Perceived Consensus: The overview and the DTD reference will stay Eric W. Sink
- Missing acknowledgement info needed Eric W. Sink
- Assumption: At the conference, you will be seeing the ASCII version Eric W. Sink
- Re: Perceived Consensus: The overview and the DTD reference will stay Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Perceived Consensus: The META element stays in the Proposed section Daniel W. Connolly
- OOPS! META got promoted; why did nbsp go away? Eric W. Sink
- Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in Eric W. Sink
- Re: Perceived Consensus: Murray's entity stuff goes in Daniel W. Connolly
- Flooding the mailing list Eric W. Sink
- Re: Perceived Consensus: No ICADD in HTML 2.0 Daniel W. Connolly
- Editorial comments on HTML 2.0 spec Earl Hood
- Re: non-alphabet characters Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: OOPS! META got promoted; why did nbsp go away? Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: TEXTAREA line terminators: platform dependent? Murray Maloney
- FORM content in DTD Stan Newton
- Document available in HTML format, PostScript to come Eric W. Sink
- HTML Claude Gross
- PostScript version available Eric W. Sink
- our ftp directory Eric W. Sink
- Another mirror site for HTML 2 stuff (just in case) Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Document available (Error in doc found) Earl Hood
- Re: Document available in HTML format, PostScript to come Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Document available (Error in doc found) Roy T. Fielding
- Editorial comments for latest 2.0 spec Earl Hood
- Errors in new HTML 2.0 spec related to FORMs Paul Burchard
- Re: Errors in new HTML 2.0 spec related to FORMs Eric W. Sink
Last message date: Fri, 14 Oct 94 16:13:26 EDT